R rostratusgar Feeder Fish MFK Member Sep 3, 2010 196 0 0 Slovakia Mar 28, 2012 #1 Hi guys I need advice - identification: Is this fish Cichlasoma urophthalmum?
A aclockworkorange Dovii MFK Member Jun 24, 2010 9,585 46 105 39 Rose City Mar 28, 2012 #2 Not the best picture but I'd say probably yes. Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
duanes MFK Moderators Staff member Moderator MFK Member Jun 7, 2007 22,623 29,685 2,910 Isla Taboga Panama via Milwaukee Mar 28, 2012 #3 To be sure, would need to see the spot next to the caudal.
S Stratoquarius Fire Eel MFK Member Oct 22, 2011 1,179 15 68 35 Calgary Mar 28, 2012 #4 from the picture I can already see its Urophthalmus. it's a nice one too. ID is 100%
F Fish_Man_Dan Gambusia MFK Member Apr 1, 2010 672 2 18 fort lauderdale, FL Mar 29, 2012 #5 Agree with above, 100% uropthalmus. More pics! sent from my EVO 3D
fishman09 Piranha MFK Member Jul 11, 2011 3,700 97 81 Centralia, WA Mar 29, 2012 #6 Almost looks like a barred amphilophus. But its more than likely a uro Sent from my LS670 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Almost looks like a barred amphilophus. But its more than likely a uro Sent from my LS670 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
C cacichlids Jack Dempsey MFK Member Feb 20, 2011 1,623 6 38 FL Mar 29, 2012 #7 I think it is, and it looks very nice too.
S Stratoquarius Fire Eel MFK Member Oct 22, 2011 1,179 15 68 35 Calgary Mar 30, 2012 #9 To justify a Uro technically is an amphilophus, and it also technically has bars.
ExoticGREEN Redtail Catfish MFK Member Jan 31, 2010 3,204 847 150 $0uth3rn C@l1f0rn!@ Mar 30, 2012 #10 Stratoquarius said: To justify a Uro technically is an amphilophus, and it also technically has bars. Click to expand... and the Aggression of one. 100% mayan
Stratoquarius said: To justify a Uro technically is an amphilophus, and it also technically has bars. Click to expand... and the Aggression of one. 100% mayan