In the wild, you'll have to aim towards working with a group that has some type of gov't grant. There aren't too many private companies that pay well and are engage in wild research.
Captive aquatic life will open more doors, but most of the jobs are related to husbandry in controlled settings. You'd be a step ahead understanding not just the biological end of it, but also exhibit care (filtration/plumbing, medications, diving, public presentations...).
hmmm , thanks , this was a good bit of info . well then i guess i'll strive to work towards working with animals in captivity rather than the wild . so is the salary much better than working in the wild ? and if u dont mind can i know what ur job is ?
Sadly, salary isn't going to be much either way.
My job is hard to define. I do a lot of work with all aspects of captive aquatic animal care. That ranges from collection, transport, exhibit design/contstruction/operation, animal health, biology, medical diagnosis/treatment, legal work (permitting), public education/speaking, filtration, chemistry, consulting etc.... It also means having an awareness of what is going on in the wild as well, so I spend a good chunk of time out learning about the natural environment and dealing with people who are experts in that area.
Wildlife biology officially. My wife and I both work full time to pay the bills. The salaray tends to be low b/c so many people are trying to get into the profession. Many would do it for free.
Yeah cost is high in some parts of the country. But a person can spread their dollars more if they live more modestly. Some people want a fancy car, HD TV, iphone and other non essential items and claim they are barely making it. There is people that can survive off $1000 a month and even less than that. A salary of $30,000 can be plenty or barely making it depending on the person and how they budget. Also, b/c means "because".