Test-Tube Burgers????

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.

MN_Rebel

Blue Tier VIP
MFK Member
Aug 5, 2008
5,686
126
340
North Pole
http://news.yahoo.com/first-taste-test-tube-burger-declared-close-meat-074252057.html


LONDON (Reuters) - The world's first laboratory-grown beef burger was flipped out of a petri dish and into a frying pan on Monday, with food tasters declaring it tasted "close to meat".

Grown in-vitro from cattle stem cells at a cost of 250,000 euros ($332,000), the burger was cooked and eaten in front of television cameras to gain the greatest media coverage for the culmination of a five-year science experiment.

Resembling a standard circular-shaped red meat patty, it was created by knitting together 20,000 strands of laboratory-grown protein, combined with other ingredients normally used in burgers, such as salt, breadcrumbs and egg powder. Red beet juice and saffron were added to give it color.

The two food tasters were reserved in their judgment, perhaps keen not to offend their host at the London event, noting the burger's "absence of fat".

Pressed for a more detailed description of the flavor, food writer Josh Schonwald said the cultured beef had an "animal protein cake" like quality to it, adding that he would like to try it with some of the extras often served with traditional burgers - salt, pepper, ketchup and jalapenos.

Even the scientist behind the burger's creation, vascular biologist Mark Post of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, was relatively muted in his praise of its flavor.

"It's a very good start," he told the hundreds of reporters who had gathered to watch the meat being cooked and served.

The Dutch scientist's aim was to show the world that in the future meat will not necessarily have to come from the environmentally and economically costly rearing and slaughtering of millions of animals.

"Current meat production is at its maximum - we need to come up with an alternative," he said.


MASSIVE SCALE

The World Health Organization (WHO) says meat production is projected to rise to 376 million tons by 2030 from 218 million tons annually in 1997-1999, and demand from a growing world population is expected to rise beyond that.

According to a 2006 report by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), industrialized agriculture contributes on a "massive scale" to climate change, air pollution, land degradation, energy use, deforestation and biodiversity decline.

The meat industry contributes about 18 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, a proportion expected to grow as consumers in fast-developing countries such as China and India eat more meat, the report said.

Chris Mason, a professor of regenerative medicine at University College London, who was not involved in the research, said it was "great pioneering science" with the potential to ease environmental, health and animal welfare problems.

But, he added: "whilst the science looks achievable, the scalable manufacturing will require new game-changing innovation".

Post said he was confident his concept can be scaled up to offer a viable alternative to animal meat production, but said it may be another 20 years before lab-grown meat appears on supermarket shelves.

He also conceded that the flavor of his meat must be improved if it is to become a popular choice.

Post resisted requests from journalists from all over the world eager to try a morsel of the world's first cultured beef burger, saying there was not enough to go around.

Instead, he said, his children would be offered the leftovers.
 
I think I'd stick with a real beef burger.
 
What they served isn't, of course, ready for prime time but represents a huge achievement and step toward sustainable meat production.

Would I eat version 1.0? Nope. That's really not the point!

For many reasons, I really hope that this is an area of continued public-private funding going forward.

As an aside, at least this is 100% meat - about 64% more than the "beef" used by Taco Bell: http://jezebel.com/5742413/this-is-what-really-hides-in-taco-bells-beef

Matt
 
I'd rather eat real beef & sustain jobs for real people & families too. the only reason we can still afford to eat meat is Thanks To the ranchers & farmers still scratching out a living in America. When they are pushed out, don't count on the class-warfare liars to actually produce any food. much less affordable meat.
 
What they served isn't, of course, ready for prime time but represents a huge achievement and step toward sustainable meat production.

Would I eat version 1.0? Nope. That's really not the point!

For many reasons, I really hope that this is an area of continued public-private funding going forward.

As an aside, at least this is 100% meat - about 64% more than the "beef" used by Taco Bell: http://jezebel.com/5742413/this-is-what-really-hides-in-taco-bells-beef

Matt

But IS IT 100% meat? It didn't come directly off an animal and there's no fat in it.... does that constitute meat?

I don't know, don't really have an opinion either way. It would be nice to see the Amazon rainforest stop being cut down for animal cultivation though.

For now, I'll keep eating fake meat products like morningstar farms, and real meat occasionally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com