Official 2013-14 NFL Thread

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
Since its gloating time, I called the steelers and giants worse then the jags after 2 weeks.

You really think Pittsburgh is worse than the jags? IMO Pitt is a 2-2 team. Their worse loss was to the bears 40-23 and they were in the game until a late pick 6. Unlike the Jaguars who cannot put points on the board at all. But, with Pittsburgh I really think they are beating themselves. 2 turnovers inside the 30 against the Bengals, late turnover against the Bears. Coming off a bye week and @ the Jets I think they will get the win.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
Yes, if we take the names off the uniforms and only looked at stats. Id go giants, jags then steelers....id then bump jags up a spot for missing their starting QB all but one game


Lol, im reaching. No i dont but the jags were suppose to suck. Pitt and NY were not


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
Pitt lost a lot of people in the off season and has a buttload of injuries ( especially on the offensive line) and the loss of mike Wallace was bigger than I thought. Then Plaxicco Burress got hurt ( yeah he's old, but still a good decoy, kind of how they used moss in San Fran last year) but, just my opinion. Now that Weeden is the starting QB in Cleveland again I wouldn't even says Pitts worst in the AFC north lol


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
I just wanna shout out a couple things this Sunday, Buffaloe played really well even though they lost....I see them becoming real contenders in the future; My Chiefs won against the Raiders for a first time in awhile, so the Raider fans at my work...r gonna hear about it this Tues. when I come in, in all chiefs attire (except shoes and pants) :headbang2 ; and it looks to be just AFC west teams left after the NE game still with perfect records, at least until KC plays Denver ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com