Guys, there's only one species of GATF that lives in the Congo. This was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by Goodier et al. (referenced below) The differences we see in GATF are nothing more than variation between individuals. Of the other two common species, TATF and VATF, we see that VATF has a similar range of difference between specimens and TATF is just all over the place; it's much worse than the GATF situation. Those are all clearly the same species and no one disputes that for them. We can't speak for FATF and BATF because of the lack of specimens in the hobby.
If you guys want something really interesting to pore over, try to figure out what is going on with
Hydrocynus cf. "Haplogroup A" as described by goodier et al. This thing is an off shoot of the
Hydrocynus vittatus species complex (VATF
sensu stricto and Groups B, C and D). It diverged from the Vittatus Complex at about the same time as did
Hydrocynus tanzaniae, which is a direct daughter lineage of the Vittatus Complex. It is, interestingly, more closely related to the part of the Vittatus Complex that became TATF than it is to the rest of the Vittatus Complex.
Guys, that's where the real head scratcher is in the ATF field; its not the issue with the shape of the tail or head of a GATF. You guys are SERIOUSLY over-thinking this issue.
View attachment 957319
Click me for the paper