Eddie ...I think this pretty well sums up my stance on punishing the vandals,WHATEVER WORKS ,to dissuade them...SO if you need any further explanation I will be glad to give it ...IN MY EXPERIENCE your reception has been poor...
Just a couple of d_bags that ought to spend some time in jail...they also should have to take care of walmarts tanks for a few months,,,with fishdeath having dire consequences
as a matter of fact to end all speculation on my original stance ... POST #4 from this thread ....nice research eddie
that's purely incorrect assumption on your part ,I merely state the obvious holes in your assessments ,all things being equal..as a matter of fact you once got mad at me for throwing in one of your OWN posts to prove you wrong...sorry I muddied things up with facts..So start with 40-60 fish killed? The problem with your idea is you assume people are too beneath you to understand what youre trying to say (see your reception is poor for your latest veiled insult). Point 2, as pet spoiler pointed out, the punishment must fit the crime as laid out by sentences from other crimes, both lesser or greater crimes. You have to overhaul everything, not start with 40-60 fish killed
nope you just assumed it (with the catcher in the rye statement ) nice going sherlock...lolThis makes no sense as ive not once requested clarification on your stance.....