Should Donald Sterling be stripped of team ownership in the NBA?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
I prefer to wait and see...I wouldn't recommend anyone patting their backs based on conjecture...not just yet. If and when a deal is done and done...well, then let's talk. Until then...any speculation as to the exact specifics of what any given deal/agreement entails is redundant.
 
I prefer to wait and see...I wouldn't recommend anyone patting their backs based on conjecture...not just yet. If and when a deal is done and done...well, then let's talk. Until then...any speculation as to the exact specifics of what any given deal/agreement entails is redundant.

at this point it is REALLY obvious , that's your only hope(Don't worry YOU can pick the clippers avatar of your choice):) but trust me when I bring up the fact,,, (Once again)DONALD STERLING is DONE running the CLIPPERS:popcorn:
 
at this point it is REALLY obvious , that's your only hope(Don't worry YOU can pick the clippers avatar of your choice):) but trust me when I bring up the fact,,, (Once again)DONALD STERLING is DONE running the CLIPPERS:popcorn:

My only hope? lol...I have no hopes...just facts...which I'm am waiting for. That's all. BUT...Yes, you are right...Donald Sterling is done running the clippers. No one is arguing that. That has been true since he was banned, prior to our disagreeing. Our bet was based on your prediction that NOBODY in the Sterling Family will retain any ownership. Like I said, when and if that happens...then hats off to you ;) However, until then...like i already said...further attempts at predicting how this will pan out is REDUNDANT...So until then...:popcorn:
 
You are right...Donald Sterling is done running the clippers. No one is arguing that. That has been true since he was banned, prior to our disagreeing. Our bet was based on your prediction that NOBODY in the Sterling Family will retain any ownership. Like I said, when and if that happens...then hats off to you ;) However, until then...like i already said...further attempts at predicting how this will pan out is REDUNDANT...So until then...:popcorn:
absolutely:) but our BET was based on CONTROLLING OWNERSHIP as I remember , either way...ESPN(A really good source) has reported the sale has been approved (or negotiation to sell) by STERLING..AS you probably know , if I were a buzzard I would be circling the your carcass (on the bet) as we speak....:)
 
LOL, OK. What are the terms...timeline? You said "I K-N-O-W that ownership is BASED ON approval by OTHER OWNERS..."

Therefore, if the collective owners have the votes and Sterling and his wife/family are removed as owners - I LOSE

BUT, if the collective owners don't have the votes OR if they do have the votes BUT this goes to court and into a legal battle - YOU LOSE

Remember, this is based on the premise that the NBA and the NBA owners are the ones in power (as you said) and are the ones who will be removing Donald Sterling and his wife/family as owners of the Clippers and will be the ones approving the new owners. If this goes to court, then your whole argument that the NBA holds all the power and that this is outside the scope of the courts (where I have argued it will end up in)... CRUMBLES.
these terms are fine based on everything but your assumption that GETTING TO COURT WINS FOR YOU... NO WAY... who ENDS up owner after it is settled is the only fair bet outcome...ANYBODY WITH RESOURCES can force a frivolous lawsuit ... this is about winning in the END...IF you don't like the FAIR BET that was offered by me (long ago) I shall let you out of said "bet" .. that would be the equivalent of claiming victory in the first quarter of a game based on leading at that point....seems to me you have been pressing a bad position on this basis of knowing the family(since day one of the thread) ...well that probably doesn't give the historical perspective( of prior sports bannings) that might actually be more relative to reality
 
I believe the bet you agreed to was that "if the collective owners have the votes and Sterling and his wife/family are removed as owners - I LOSE".

In this case the owners may not even be voting and AGAIN...Need to wait and see if DS and his wife/family are removed as owners. Nothing about controlling interest. Just that they would be gone, gone, gone, lol. Look, if Donald and Shelly retain no ownership of the team and are forced out by the NBA...by all means...I will uphold my end of the bet. I've been looking at some cool Clipper's avatars (for you, haha), but if things don't go my way...hey, saves me the trouble...
 
They're probably going to vote anyways. Why recognize mrs sterling as a controlling owner? You never have before.

Truth is they either see the writing on the wall and are cashing out or they're trying to trick the NBA. If they're cashing out they were still forced into it no matter who handles the sale AND whoever takes over will need to be approved by the NBA. so it's out of the family regardless and the NBA is in the drivers seat. Face it, some people made bold remarks and it's looking like theyre dead wrong right about now. Thank you for bringing legal matter into a non legal affair


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
His wife owns half the team. She is not part of the ban. If he removes himself then she remains the owner. She is not part of the ban. You don't have to be on the "inside" of anything to see that. Apparently Lee is the "inside guy" since he knows exactly how this is going to pan out. You talking to Comm. Silver? Tell us what you know...what's the word in Phoenix?
still banging that drum????..I reported (via ESPN ) THAT ACCORDING TO THE LEAGUE ... banning includes ENTIRE ownership...as per NBA by-laws,,,,,,,, stop running down legitimate info based on your lack of knowledge of said info...LOOK IT UP FIRST ,,,,,,, ONCE AGAIN....you can BACK OUT of the FAIR BET offered ..no hurt feelings here
 
you can argue all you want about what YOU SAID(to create the illusion you might not be wrong , still) but in a couple of weeks (or thereabouts) you will be 100% correct , if you point out that BOC & MYSELF probably knew what the heck we were talking about all along...to sum it up , it Is a knowledge of SPORTS HISTORY that was found to be the basis of correct prediction of the outcome ,not "CALIFORNIA LAW"( MOSTLY because it can't be applied, against an ownership contract in the NBA)

Hard to argue that I was wrong when all I commented on was my interest in seeing him try to fight this and it end up in court due to my own curiosity. I'm actually pretty disappointed that this is apparently being handled without the league forcing sale as the legal aspect of the whole situation is all that had me interested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com