Lol true. say there's a wild chance that a fighter is involved but it'd be done in a way that could never be tracked back to them. Boosters or mob/gangsters.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Fight of the century: mayweather vs pacquiao thread
- Thread starter ballinouttacntrol
- Start date
Lol true. say there's a wild chance that a fighter is involved but it'd be done in a way that could never be tracked back to them. Boosters or mob/gangsters.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
this is way more logical and realistic to me
if someone would at least point out the judges, refs or fighters who have shady career moments or their names come up with certain conspiracies,............things like that, then I can see the skepticisms.
but it seems in this thread things are being pulled out of a magical bunny hat
lol, yal watching too much tv
things like this have happened in real life, but there is always rumors that go around before the truth comes out
It's been proven to have happen in the past so what does TV have to do with it?
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
it's a lot more common in movies
in real life, the cases I know of, before the truth comes out there already is rumors and controversy surrounding the people involved.
in this fight, there is none of that, just a lot of talking out the arses. that's what i'm saying
in real life, the cases I know of, before the truth comes out there already is rumors and controversy surrounding the people involved.
in this fight, there is none of that, just a lot of talking out the arses. that's what i'm saying
To me it takes a tinfoil hat to believe that boxing is pure and always fairly judged. If you believe that, I got an autographed mayweather and pacquiao glove I can sell you.
I mean just a few months-years ago you kept telling me this fight would never happen. Now you're saying it's not plausible that foul play could be involved. Credibility lost bro
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
I mean just a few months-years ago you kept telling me this fight would never happen. Now you're saying it's not plausible that foul play could be involved. Credibility lost bro
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
please, just stop and don't get it twisted. me saying one thing doesn't mean I believe it's all clean and fair
and i have always said this fight could happen. didn't believe it would at one point but always left it open. I've said it numerous times. don't act like you don't know that
you need to read my posts more carefully. even in this thread i said it's not that it (foul play) can't happen. i don't see any evidence that would lead to question it (SPECIFICALLY about the fighters involved only)
the fighters possibly being involved is what i believe even less.
officials being involved is way more believable, is what i'm saying
and i have always said this fight could happen. didn't believe it would at one point but always left it open. I've said it numerous times. don't act like you don't know that
you need to read my posts more carefully. even in this thread i said it's not that it (foul play) can't happen. i don't see any evidence that would lead to question it (SPECIFICALLY about the fighters involved only)
the fighters possibly being involved is what i believe even less.
officials being involved is way more believable, is what i'm saying
if there was evidence people would be being arrested as we speak. You're reaching for something impossible (proof when we don't even know the judges) for you to even consider the possibility but you're saying sure there's a possibility but it's wrong for us to verbalize it????
let's just kill another topic before it goes full retard cuz that's where this convo is heading. We still got months of hype and we're already dragging it down with our second pointless argument
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
let's just kill another topic before it goes full retard cuz that's where this convo is heading. We still got months of hype and we're already dragging it down with our second pointless argument
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
you all can say whatever the hell you want, lol. knock yourselfs out. this is a public discussion
but don't expect me to not say anything about it.
i'm calling it like I see it. people have brought up, not only as a possibility, but as a fact that if one or the other wins, it's because they paid officials.
with no logical reasons or explanations,..........ok? just pulling things out of a hat.
so here I am, only saying that I don't like to make those kinds of statements without logical reasons.
has it happened in other fights? yes. can it happen in this fight? sure. but I don't believe that if there is foul play that it will involve the fighters themselves. because I have no reason to believe that. that's all i'm saying
get it??
but don't expect me to not say anything about it.
i'm calling it like I see it. people have brought up, not only as a possibility, but as a fact that if one or the other wins, it's because they paid officials.
with no logical reasons or explanations,..........ok? just pulling things out of a hat.
so here I am, only saying that I don't like to make those kinds of statements without logical reasons.
has it happened in other fights? yes. can it happen in this fight? sure. but I don't believe that if there is foul play that it will involve the fighters themselves. because I have no reason to believe that. that's all i'm saying
get it??
btw, shoot, i don't know about you
but these convos are what's making the thread. you should thank me
without these convos, we can only hear so much of "can't wait", "so excited", "pac will win", "may will win"
but these convos are what's making the thread. you should thank me
without these convos, we can only hear so much of "can't wait", "so excited", "pac will win", "may will win"
