POS step father drowns toddler

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Right,the guy was callous and abusive toward the childl,his actions whether intentional or not caused the child's death.Everything else brought up is pretty much moot.
 
ballinouttacntrol said:
Yeah, I don't think he cared anything about the toddler.
Click to expand...
I'm sure he's thought about how sweet it would be if it were just him and the mom and no extra baggage....like somebody else's kid.
 
xraycer said:
I'm sure he's thought about how sweet it would be if it were just him and the mom and no extra baggage....like somebody else's kid.
Click to expand...
The article stated he was at the hotel with a "partner"....likely someone else who didn't care much about the child.
 
i don't know what to say, it looks like this guy was torturing the girl. he didn't look loving and caring at all and I don't see how he was teaching her how to swim. looks like he was simply just making her suffer

I know the video is chopped up and stuff but this guy was definitely intending to harm the kid. maybe he didn't intend to kill her, but my conclusion is that his abuse is what led to her death
 
ballinouttacntrol said:
This thread took an interesting turn.

A) you don't have to be in the pool to drown from too much water in your lung. Drowning doesn't mean you're under water for too long.

B) I assure you if she drowned inside or near the pool their is video evidence, a news reporter won't put it in their story meant to run on TV or Internet ...but with some research I'm sure you could find it

C) are we absolving a parent for the child they're responsible for for drowning just because the child may have had fun and was being taught how to swim? Accident or not, It's still neglect

I'm a kid tosser, never that young and never like that. You can't honestly think that's ok for a 3 year old.
Click to expand...
How did you come up with the idea that anyone thinks what he done was ok for a 3 yearsold? The same way you decided the guy is guilty of drowning or torturing the kid from watching a cut and paste video? A news reporter won't put evident in story that meant to run on TV or on Internet? Why not? Code of ethic? Do you really believe that? From the video, UVA v Rolling Stones, or Asiana v the news channel that broadcasted the pilot names, is it fair to say that reporter will put anything that made their story sticks in a hurry so that they can be the first to report? And WebMD? I may get the same result from Ms Cleo. Did you miss this when you used the site?

image.jpg
 
Whoa, Bro, you've just completely opened my eyes! I had no idea news are bias and just trying to sell stories. Thank you so much for the public service and awareness. You truly are the only wise one here. The rest of us are just mere sheeps
 
xraycer said:
Whoa, Bro, you've just completely opened my eyes! I had no idea news are bias and just trying to sell stories. Thank you so much for the public service and awareness. You truly are the only wise one here. The rest of us are just mere sheeps
Click to expand...
Sarcasm I hope? How blind do you have to be to see a difference between Fox News and CNN?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom