This Is Where PetSmart Gets Its Animals, And It's Not Pretty

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
We may have learned it in second grade, but most of us don't believe it.

ok, then yes. if I had to run into a burning building and save either hitler or my dog, I would save my dog.


Some of us do. If we all did there would be no such thing as crimes of passion. but the same can be said of animals. There are many dogs who's natural instinct is to chase after that squirrel but have been taught it's not an acceptable behavior in all instances. When they're loose in the backyard it's fun and games time. Walking on the leash, not acceptable.


It's funny, but you just explained yourself to the point of the first post you quoted.
People who say sentience is the sole domain of humanity are wrong. Sentience is not on or off, it's a matter of degree amongst many creatures.
You ask about giving food to others. Do you know some plants do that? Some species of plants will reduce their root growth when surrounded by their seed mates.
Wolves share food with the rest of the pack. They also have societal ways of solving disagreements, as do many other animals do so they don't damage each other. Humans often kill each other in disputes.

Hilter ? Really if that is the extent you need to go to feel your on the correct side of this then so be it.

Interesting about the plants i didnt know that.
True about the wolves and dogs . But for the two examples you have come up 20 can be stated for humans.

Nothing wrong with how you feel no need to try and prove it to me or anyone else but questioning what reality i live in because i value humans lives over animals is a stretch at best.

Agree completely with Wailua Boy Wailua Boy if the person were a threat to society i would feel different
 
Hilter ? Really if that is the extent you need to go to feel your on the correct side of this then so be it.

Interesting about the plants i didnt know that.
True about the wolves and dogs . But for the two examples you have come up 20 can be stated for humans.

Nothing wrong with how you feel no need to try and prove it to me or anyone else but questioning what reality i live in because i value humans lives over animals is a stretch at best.

Agree completely with Wailua Boy Wailua Boy if the person were a threat to society i would feel different


As far as my feeling right, your question had nothing to do with my statements in the post you quoted, so has nothing to do with a question of sapience being a human specific trait.

you're kidding, right? I ask for specifics and you narrow it down to billions of people and an innumerable amount of animals and you want to give me a hard time for using the first thing that pops into my head?


Try these on for size then.
I'm walking through the woods and come to a river where across the way I see a man and a dog. The dog is trying to climb out of the river, the man keeps kicking him back in. On the last kick the man punts the dog out into the current where he's swept away from the shore. Coincidently his last kick threw him off balance and he falls into the river hitting his head on a rock. Dazed from the blow he too is swept away by the current. The dogs struggles slow his pace while the mans woozy struggles barely keep him above water so they both pass by me at the same time allowing me to only grab one.
I grab the dog leaving the POS human to drown. I feel no guilt.

I'm walking through the woods and come to a river where across the way I see a man and a dog. The dog is trying to climb out of the river, The man, attempting to rescue his dog, manages to heave his dog onto the bank but slips and falls into the river. The dog, seeing it's human in danger throws itself back into the river in an attempt to help him.
In this scenario, I would probably try to rescue the human, but that to is dependent on other factors. If I think I can actually perform the rescue, if he yells save my dog (after all, he was willing to risk his life for the dog in the first place, who am I to disallow his life choices?). I would feel guilty either way, though glad I was able to save a life.

Or we can go back in the thread a bit...
According to a 1983 investigation by Canadian Broadcasting Corporation producer Brian Vallee, the lemming scenes were faked. The lemmings supposedly committing mass suicide by leaping into the ocean were actually thrown off a cliff by the Disney filmmakers. The epic "lemming migration" was staged using careful editing, tight camera angles and a few dozen lemmings running on snow covered lazy-Susan style turntable.
These SFBs killed animals for no reason greater than making a movie. I would happily go back in time and shove them off a cliff to prevent them from doing it to the lemmings.

Interesting how I ask for specifics and you supply none, but I make a general statement to another person and you take it as a specific directed towards you.
 
Hilter ? Really if that is the extent you need to go to feel your on the correct side of this then so be it.

Interesting about the plants i didnt know that.
True about the wolves and dogs . But for the two examples you have come up 20 can be stated for humans.

Nothing wrong with how you feel no need to try and prove it to me or anyone else but questioning what reality i live in because i value humans lives over animals is a stretch at best.

Agree completely with Wailua Boy Wailua Boy if the person were a threat to society i would feel different
leave the argument. There's no hope for either of you.
 
I know my morality leans more towards the animals than the humans, but animals don't abuse humans, and animals are abused by humans often.
Animals don't kill off hundreds of species of humans on a regular basis either.
Someone has to help the helpless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Castle
I know my morality leans more towards the animals than the humans, but animals don't abuse humans, and animals are abused by humans often.
Animals don't kill off hundreds of species of humans on a regular basis either.
Someone has to help the helpless.
Watch out we have superman over here to help the animals.
 
easy guys, debates are great long as things kept to just that,. no need to take anything personnel, once that happens points are not heard, ideals are not heard. Just sayen :)
 
leave the argument. There's no hope for either of you.


Yes i agree been told that most of my life lol ;)
[
QUOTE="pops, post: 7458948, member: 119404"]easy guys, debates are great long as things kept to just that,. no need to take anything personnel, once that happens points are not heard, ideals are not heard. Just sayen :)[/QUOTE]

Im not upset at all gill seems to be agitated.

Gill why would i waste the time giving you examples of why i value human life over animal life. Cant change your opinion and dont care too. All you will do is disagree, You seem like the type that is dead set on his point of view.

Your right buddy those plaants share their food so they have to be waaaaaaay better than those evil humans.
 
Gill Blue Gill Blue i have to give you credit though. Others that share your point of view (always the same people) make some whacked out claims get everyonw t respond then dont have the nuggets to stay involved in the convo. You wont back off ao i can dig it.

Question (not being a smart ass) if it were me that chose to save the dog over one of your family members how would you feel ?

Your example of someone beating the dog is tainted in the fact the human was doing something wrong and being a peice of $! $! Of course screw him.
 
Dang gill, I'm surprised you're still here. I usually argue for a bit then leave. It's like arguing over politics or religion. You're not going convince who ever you're arguing with to change the way they think. I've blocked several users over these threads. Most of this thread is just you talking to yourself lol. I'm not going to convince anyone and no one is going to convince me.

Agree to disagree lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Castle
MonsterFishKeepers.com