Your Move,Viper!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
twentyleagues said:
call me a name or dont but dont half ass it to try to start something
Click to expand...
twentyleagues said:
But if those beliefs lead to someone being ostracized isnt that where it starts? The Nazis beliefs that they were the correct humans to inhabit the earth probably didnt seem so crazy in their minds. The kkk beliefs of colored people as lesser beings doesnt sound crazy to them.
Click to expand...
Hello; I will figure you know what you are doing with the use of these terms. A common and unfortunately generally successful tactic on this forum. In past such a strategy has been successful in getting a thread closed. When enough others clearly refute a flawed argument then this sort of language comes out. Seems designed to inflame and bait others into "hot" responses. . I hope this tactic does not get yet another thread closed
I have learned a lesson and will not be baited into an uncivil response because my opinion has been equated to the two highlighted beliefs in your comments. I understood your points well enough and do not see the need for such an escalation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAYBIRD1011
skjl47 said:
Hello; I will figure you know what you are doing with the use of these terms. A common and unfortunately generally successful tactic on this forum. In past such a strategy has been successful in getting a thread closed. When enough others clearly refute a flawed argument then this sort of language comes out. Seems designed to inflame and bait others into "hot" responses. . I hope this tactic does not get yet another thread closed
I have learned a lesson and will not be baited into an uncivil response because my opinion has been equated to the two highlighted beliefs in your comments. I understood your points well enough and do not see the need for such an escalation.
Click to expand...
You are pretty good at it to apparently. The whole "I could call you a name but I wont" statement in my mind you just called me something. And then quote part of what my statment was on that kkk and Nazis that ended with "that's an extreme example" that you conveniently left off. I was angry that you pulled that I could but won't bit but I'm over it and really wasnt trying to bait you. I just think if you are going to say something say it to my face dont whisper it to yourself. I'm done with this conversation over all do as you all like. It's a good thing to remember no matter who is reading to your kids be it guy, girl, drag queen, clown or cowboy be involved they all could be weirdos or perfectly good people trying to do good.
Peace and joy to you all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dloks
twentyleagues said:
You are pretty good at it to apparently. The whole "I could call you a name but I wont" statement in my mind you just called me something. And then quote part of what my statment was on that kkk and Nazis that ended with "that's an extreme example" that you conveniently left off. I was angry that you pulled that I could but won't bit but I'm over it and really wasnt trying to bait you. I just think if you are going to say something say it to my face dont whisper it to yourself. I'm done with this conversation over all do as you all like. It's a good thing to remember no matter who is reading to your kids be it guy, girl, drag queen, clown or cowboy be involved they all could be weirdos or perfectly good people trying to do good.
Peace and joy to you all.
Click to expand...

Hello; Since twenty leagues is quit from this thread, or at least this current particular topic, my comments will be for clarification. Pretty sure I did not call any names but will conceded I often do not understand what is in the mind of some folks. I try to make my points while staying within the site rules especially lately after the warnings handed out by the Mods.

Yes associating my opinion and also the opinion of a few other members with the Nazis and the KKK beliefs was and is an extreme example. That twenty leagues clearly knew it was extreme and went ahead with the comments is the telling point. His acknowledging a comment is extreme does not, to me at least, lessen the impact of making the comment. I did feel then and still feel my opinions were equated to beliefs of the two groups named. That I do not see my opinion that way is not a surprise I guess.

I do get twenty leagues points of view but simply do not agree with them. I have no way to know in general what the personality of a man dressing as a woman might be who plans to go read to children. I do know from news reports that at least one of those men turned out to be a convicted sex offender. So in one particular case I feel confident he was not there to try to do good. I simply do not like the idea even if all the rest of those men are nice guys.
 
Im still trying to figure out the point of having these readings.... who benefits from it ?

Political grandstanding most likely
 
jaws7777 said:
Im still trying to figure out the point of having these readings.... who benefits from it ?

Political grandstanding most likely
Click to expand...
The libtard pinkos who run the libraries and the crossdressers are who benefit as they get to dump their agendas onto young minds,the children certainly don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deadliestviper7 and skjl47
jaws7777 said:
Im still trying to figure out the point of having these readings.... who benefits from it ?

Political grandstanding most likely
Click to expand...
Hello; I am going to figure these men can wear men's style clothing and very likely already have some men's clothing. Might be wrong about that but that is what I figure. If that is true then the decision to wear womens clothes is a choice for a reason. That a group of men did so at the same time ought to indicate some sort of planning.
So I can see the political grandstanding angle as a possibility. Of all the responses so far my pick is the idea of indoctrination of the children by exposure.
 
skjl47 said:
Hello; I am going to figure these men can wear men's style clothing and very likely already have some men's clothing. Might be wrong about that but that is what I figure. If that is true then the decision to wear womens clothes is a choice for a reason. That a group of men did so at the same time ought to indicate some sort of planning.
So I can see the political grandstanding angle as a possibility. Of all the responses so far my pick is the idea of indoctrination of the children by exposure.
Click to expand...
These things (indoctrination) are a huge concern for my wife and I. Its important that she stays very active in the kids school so shes aware of what b.s they try to force down our throats.

I wonder how the school board peddles this off to the parents. I cant imagine what excuse they make to explain how this benefits the kids.

krichardson said:
The libtard pinkos who run the libraries and the crossdressers are who benefit as they get to dump their agendas onto young minds,the children certainly don't.
Click to expand...

Probably right. Wife was telling me there was a recent story about how a child was taken from two parents who would routinely bring the kid to these parades and post videos of the kid half naked dancing in the street with grown men surrounding him.... just sick
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom