The admin here don't use the ban hammer often, and when they do it is usually for a very good reason. They didn't ban him just for being an idiot. I would have, many months back. The real irony is how some people here supported this kid, and some of his idiotic ideals. Like keeping oscars in a 55 gallon .....I don't really understand the bannings. That guy seemed to contribute reasonably. There are always going to be some disagreements on an online forum. Swinging the banhammer seems a bit extreme.
A bit of a tangent, but when I was a kid, my uncle had a pleco and an oscar in a 55 for a really long time. That was my first look at fishkeeping. He kept the tank bare bottom, and the fish were well cared for. The pleco was there to clean the glass. Seemed ok to me then, but I didn't know any better at the time. For me now, a 180 is the correct size tank for an oscar or any fish in the 14-16" range.The admin here don't use the ban hammer often, and when they do it is usually for a very good reason. They didn't ban him just for being an idiot. I would have, many months back. The real irony is how some people here supported this kid, and some of his idiotic ideals. Like keeping oscars in a 55 gallon .....
....as requested
View attachment 1379681
Nope and its not up for debate. You will use NLS and like it...matter of fact you should sprinkle it on your own food up to 3 times a dayMan, why is it getting more and more difficult to engage in a civilized conversation where opinions are to be respected and not shoved into eachother's face? If someone asks for opinions/advise he shouldn't try to "correct" whoever gave him. Opinions differ, that's what keeps the hobby interesting. Can we just agree to disagree? Just my 2¢ , sorry for interrupting.