2012 NFL Draft

[Wiggles92]

Barkley > keenum

Most definitely. Keenum is still on the board, though, so we'll see what happens.

 

[ballinouttacntrol]

I meant weeden Oops


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

 

[Wiggles92]

I meant weeden Oops

Haha, I was wondering if that's what you meant; I was sitting here thinking, "Keenum is still available..."

 

[Wiggles92]

Apparently McCoy is still expected to report to the Browns off-season training program, but one has to wonder if he'll ask for a trade or if they'll trade him otherwise.

 

[cmsbthebest]

Apparently McCoy is still expected to report to the Browns off-season training program, but one has to wonder if he'll ask for a trade or if they'll trade him otherwise.

I bet he gets traded (or at least wants to be). Sometimes a fresh start is the best thing for someone.


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

 

[product_08]

Really happy with the packets draft, picked up some players of need and depth as well, can't wait to see what undrafted free agents we get.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

 

[cmsbthebest]

I cant believe I haven't talked about the giants yet. I like our first pick, even though he wasn't highly rated compared to most 1st rounders, I trust the giants when they say he was by far the second best back in the draft.

Getting randle in the second was awesome. We wanted him in the first, so getting him at the end of the second is kind of shocking. He'll be better than Mario manningham, who could not run correct routes and at times had a sever case of the dropsies.

I'm not gonna get into details about the other picks, I like them for the most part and have faith in the giants (who I think has been the best drafting team since Jerry Reece took over) for picking them.

Grade: A-


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

 

[Wiggles92]

Here's the grades according to the "Czar's team-by-team NFL Draft grades" article:

[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]

A+​

[/td]
[td]Pittsburgh Steelers[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

A​

[/td]
[td]Cincinnati Bengals[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

A​

[/td]
[td]New England Patriots[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

A​

[/td]
[td]St. Louis Rams[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

A-​

[/td]
[td]Indianapolis Colts[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

A-​

[/td]
[td]Washington Redskins[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B+​

[/td]
[td]Arizona Cardinals[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B+​

[/td]
[td]Dallas Cowboys[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B+​

[/td]
[td]Kansas City Chiefs[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B+​

[/td]
[td]Tampa Bay Buccaneers[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]Baltimore Ravens[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]Buffalo Bills[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]Carolina Panthers[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]Green Bay Packers[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]New York Giants[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]Philadelphia Eagles[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]San Diego Chargers[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B​

[/td]
[td]Seattle Seahawks[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B-​

[/td]
[td]Denver Broncos[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B-​

[/td]
[td]Detroit Lions[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B-​

[/td]
[td]Houston Texans[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

B-​

[/td]
[td]Minnesota Vikings[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C+​

[/td]
[td]San Francisco 49ers[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C​

[/td]
[td]Atlanta Falcons[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C​

[/td]
[td]Cleveland Browns[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C​

[/td]
[td]Jacksonville Jaguars[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C​

[/td]
[td]Miami Dolphins[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C​

[/td]
[td]New York Jets[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C​

[/td]
[td]Tennessee Titans[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

C-​

[/td]
[td]Chicago Bears[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

D​

[/td]
[td]New Orleans Saints[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]

D​

[/td]
[td]Oakland Raiders[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

All in all, there are definitely some interesting gradings. I agree with most of them, but there are a few that I think should be higher/lower.

 

[Wiggles92]

And for anyone who's weird like me and cares how each conference & division drafted:

Conference Averages:
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[tr]
[td]NFC[/td]
[td]B/B-[/td]
[td]2.81[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]AFC[/td]
[td]B/B-[/td]
[td]2.79[/td]
[/tr]
[/tr]
[/table]

AFC Division Averages:
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]AFC North[/td]
[td]B+[/td]
[td]3.33[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]AFC East[/td]
[td]B/B-[/td]
[td]2.75[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]AFC South[/td]
[td]B-/C+[/td]
[td]2.59[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]AFC West[/td]
[td]B-/C+[/td]
[td]2.50[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

NFC Averages:
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]NFC East[/td]
[td]B+/B[/td]
[td]3.25[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]NFC West[/td]
[td]B+/B[/td]
[td]3.17[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]NFC North[/td]
[td]B-/C+[/td]
[td]2.50[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]NFC South[/td]
[td]C+[/td]
[td]2.33[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

A 4.33 scale was used in order to account for the weighted grades.

 

[funcolandtrav]

I'm keeping an eye on the AFC North as I like to see what the competition is looking like for my favorite team, the Steelers.



I think that Cleveland messed up big time on that one since he was another QB that should have gone much later. Then again, they had to balance out their smart decision to move up to get Richardson with a not-so-smart choice to get Weeden this early.

Whodey!


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app