jcardona1 Feeder Fish MFK Member Jun 5, 2007 11,491 40 0 43 South of Heaven Apr 11, 2010 #21 lol not that soon! that's a huge investment. maybe once i figure out how to get decent pics first
haynchinook334 Giant Snakehead MFK Member Feb 14, 2008 14,486 249 147 \m/(O_o)\m/ Apr 11, 2010 #22 jcardona1;4062898; said: yeah just a few days ago hahah. but i'm itching to have a high speed lens at all zoom levels; from 11-16, 17-55, and 70-200. that's about $3500 worth of glass though hit me up if youre interested, just trying to get back what i paid for it Click to expand... Yeah, That $3500 ain't no joke bro. But, I'll hit you up when I want to snag that 18-200mm off you.
jcardona1;4062898; said: yeah just a few days ago hahah. but i'm itching to have a high speed lens at all zoom levels; from 11-16, 17-55, and 70-200. that's about $3500 worth of glass though hit me up if youre interested, just trying to get back what i paid for it Click to expand... Yeah, That $3500 ain't no joke bro. But, I'll hit you up when I want to snag that 18-200mm off you.
Modest_Man Polypterus MFK Member Jul 5, 2006 4,668 224 96 40 Washington Apr 12, 2010 #23 Hence why I've started buying lenses made in the 70'-80's. The glass is the same, you just have to shoot manually for 1/20th the price. Great shots, I've never been a fan of the way tall objects on the sides fold into the middle, I have the same issue with my wide angle.
Hence why I've started buying lenses made in the 70'-80's. The glass is the same, you just have to shoot manually for 1/20th the price. Great shots, I've never been a fan of the way tall objects on the sides fold into the middle, I have the same issue with my wide angle.
M m1ste2tea Jack Dempsey MFK Member Nov 17, 2009 1,086 1 38 Syracuse, NY Apr 13, 2010 #24 beautiful, it doesnt even look this good in person.