Angler;1862316; said:Many Oscar's won't get over 12 or 13 inches, but some do.
Male vs. Female, perhaps?![]()
Angler;1862316; said:Many Oscar's won't get over 12 or 13 inches, but some do.
Male vs. Female, perhaps?![]()
zacjeff;1862533; said:Angler;1862316; said:Many Oscar's won't get over 12 or 13 inches, but some do.
Male vs. Female, perhaps?![]()
No, actually not.
pcfriedrich;1862897; said:even when full grown, you really can't tell a male from a female, unless you pants them. they are the "Pats" of the fish world.
you can have females bigger than males, and vice versa. if your aquarium is 15" deep, it should be fine for an O, at least for a couple years.
Exactly.
zacjeff - If you want people to try and help you out and give advice to you, try not being an ***, especially when you're a newb.
meant wondering, or out of curiosity. (Scratching its head.) Aparently not, so I believe I owe you an apology: I'm sorry. (Is there a smily shrugging its shoulders?)zacjeff;1868541; said:Whoa! I thoughtmeant wondering, or out of curiosity. (Scratching its head.) Aparently not, so I believe I owe you an apology: I'm sorry. (Is there a smily shrugging its shoulders?)
I know oscars are not sexually dimorphic, and have no color differences between the sexes. I was wondering if there was a size or body proportion difference.
Could the difference in max size be caused by inbreeding, or just the genetics from the wild, depending on the size of the body of water the wild ancestors were collected from. The only reason I press this issue is I am looking for an idea for my senior aquatic biology program project, and the less-obvious effects of inbreeding would make a cool topic.
.
means you're an idiot.