A Father Kills His Dog To Get His Son's Finger

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
I never said I wouldn't do the same, if my dog bit my little girls anything off and I had a chance to save it then nothings gonna stop me not even killing a friend

I respect life in general and don't think any life should be taken without reason.

And I wasn't involved in the other thread your referring to but I agree you should protect yourself, to me that's survival as i said in my previous s post, its natural to protect yourself.

But think of it this way, you felt the need to "defend" yourself from said dog threw fear of you being attacked/injured,So you felt provoked and threatened right?

Then why when a dog or any other animal is feeling provoked and/or threatened and it "defends" itself, the rules are different?
Why do you feel your life should be above a dogs? Because we domesticated them and made them our "property"?

I'm not wishing harm on anyone and I'm not saying people shouldn't value human life and if it come to saving a person or an animal of corse you would help the person in trouble 1st, It just really annoys me the attitude of the a vast majority of the human race that think they are supreme and more important than anything or anyone on this planet.

This isn't directed at anyone personally I am just trying to get my point across.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

Hello; I understand your point, I just do not agree with it. The rules are somewhat different for animals than people, but perhaps only in degree. There are consequences for humans that attack other humans. Humans usually get more protections under our various legal systems in terms of a right to trials and such. Humans can talk and explain an action that may be justified. Should a human attack another person and get caught there will be a price paid, sometimes up to and including death.

In this particular situation the dog was in a cage and the boy apparently was not in a position to hurt the animal. Nor is there, so far, any indication that the boy was trying to hurt the dog. The dog was safe and likely not being threatened. The dog made a bad judgment choice and for some reason decided to bite a finger off and swallow it. Even had the dog not been killed right away we could not ask it why. Once an animal makes such a bad judgment call, it can only be suspected that similar bad judgments may happen again. This is a reason why an animal that attacks a person should be put down.

I suspect that over the thousands of years that it took for dogs to be domesticated, a lot of dogs with bad judgment were culled. A dog that would attack a person was likely put down and the ones that got along well were kept. That practice is, for the most part, the way people see it still. I do not want a dog that bites/attacks around my home and hope that my neighbors do not keep such dogs.

We, people, made the rules because we can. The moral indignation is an interesting point of view but not very practical in day to day living. Some animals refused to be domesticated and are not kept as pets. They remain wild. Dogs made a deal with us over a period of time by allowing themselves to be domesticated. Part of the deal was that they not bite, attack or eat our fingers. Cattle made the same deal and some will likely say they did not make as good a deal as the dogs did. Biting breaks the deal for the most part.
Some dogs are somewhat free to bite such as those trained by the police and the military. They can bite and attack within the parameters of their training.

I taught biology/ecology classes for several decades and also understand what you are saying about how people treat the environment. That does not apply to pet dogs. Our pet dogs/cats are no longer wild animals; they have become an extension/accessory to our way of life. How much wild life is impacted by our dogs and especially our cats. I spent the last few days breaking up the new nest that a pair of robbins have been trying to build in my car port. The car port makes a great nesting place as it is protected from the weather. Last year robbins nested there and had young raised to near ready to leave the nest. The cat prints on my truck windshield and roof told the story. I found the feathers of the robbins around the yard. I hope that the birds find a better place to raise a family. I know the cat will be back around at some point.
 
Hello; I understand your point, I just do not agree with it. The rules are somewhat different for animals than people, but perhaps only in degree. There are consequences for humans that attack other humans. Humans usually get more protections under our various legal systems in terms of a right to trials and such. Humans can talk and explain an action that may be justified. Should a human attack another person and get caught there will be a price paid, sometimes up to and including death.

In this particular situation the dog was in a cage and the boy apparently was not in a position to hurt the animal. Nor is there, so far, any indication that the boy was trying to hurt the dog. The dog was safe and likely not being threatened. The dog made a bad judgment choice and for some reason decided to bite a finger off and swallow it. Even had the dog not been killed right away we could not ask it why. Once an animal makes such a bad judgment call, it can only be suspected that similar bad judgments may happen again. This is a reason why an animal that attacks a person should be put down.

I suspect that over the thousands of years that it took for dogs to be domesticated, a lot of dogs with bad judgment were culled. A dog that would attack a person was likely put down and the ones that got along well were kept. That practice is, for the most part, the way people see it still. I do not want a dog that bites/attacks around my home and hope that my neighbors do not keep such dogs.

We, people, made the rules because we can. The moral indignation is an interesting point of view but not very practical in day to day living. Some animals refused to be domesticated and are not kept as pets. They remain wild. Dogs made a deal with us over a period of time by allowing themselves to be domesticated. Part of the deal was that they not bite, attack or eat our fingers. Cattle made the same deal and some will likely say they did not make as good a deal as the dogs did. Biting breaks the deal for the most part.
Some dogs are somewhat free to bite such as those trained by the police and the military. They can bite and attack within the parameters of their training.

I taught biology/ecology classes for several decades and also understand what you are saying about how people treat the environment. That does not apply to pet dogs. Our pet dogs/cats are no longer wild animals; they have become an extension/accessory to our way of life. How much wild life is impacted by our dogs and especially our cats. I spent the last few days breaking up the new nest that a pair of robbins have been trying to build in my car port. The car port makes a great nesting place as it is protected from the weather. Last year robbins nested there and had young raised to near ready to leave the nest. The cat prints on my truck windshield and roof told the story. I found the feathers of the robbins around the yard. I hope that the birds find a better place to raise a family. I know the cat will be back around at some point.
Well this dog in question wasn't a dog but a hybrid wolf dog which could explains why it attacked a child as the wolfdog tends to be more predatory than the domestic dogs.
 
Hello; I understand your point, I just do not agree with it. The rules are somewhat different for animals than people, but perhaps only in degree. There are consequences for humans that attack other humans. Humans usually get more protections under our various legal systems in terms of a right to trials and such. Humans can talk and explain an action that may be justified. Should a human attack another person and get caught there will be a price paid, sometimes up to and including death.

In this particular situation the dog was in a cage and the boy apparently was not in a position to hurt the animal. Nor is there, so far, any indication that the boy was trying to hurt the dog. The dog was safe and likely not being threatened. The dog made a bad judgment choice and for some reason decided to bite a finger off and swallow it. Even had the dog not been killed right away we could not ask it why. Once an animal makes such a bad judgment call, it can only be suspected that similar bad judgments may happen again. This is a reason why an animal that attacks a person should be put down.

I suspect that over the thousands of years that it took for dogs to be domesticated, a lot of dogs with bad judgment were culled. A dog that would attack a person was likely put down and the ones that got along well were kept. That practice is, for the most part, the way people see it still. I do not want a dog that bites/attacks around my home and hope that my neighbors do not keep such dogs.

We, people, made the rules because we can. The moral indignation is an interesting point of view but not very practical in day to day living. Some animals refused to be domesticated and are not kept as pets. They remain wild. Dogs made a deal with us over a period of time by allowing themselves to be domesticated. Part of the deal was that they not bite, attack or eat our fingers. Cattle made the same deal and some will likely say they did not make as good a deal as the dogs did. Biting breaks the deal for the most part.
Some dogs are somewhat free to bite such as those trained by the police and the military. They can bite and attack within the parameters of their training.

I taught biology/ecology classes for several decades and also understand what you are saying about how people treat the environment. That does not apply to pet dogs. Our pet dogs/cats are no longer wild animals; they have become an extension/accessory to our way of life. How much wild life is impacted by our dogs and especially our cats. I spent the last few days breaking up the new nest that a pair of robbins have been trying to build in my car port. The car port makes a great nesting place as it is protected from the weather. Last year robbins nested there and had young raised to near ready to leave the nest. The cat prints on my truck windshield and roof told the story. I found the feathers of the robbins around the yard. I hope that the birds find a better place to raise a family. I know the cat will be back around at some point.
OOOH, so the dog was caged up, and the kid decided to go by the cage? the kid must have done something to provoke the dog safety.... now if the dog was loose, i can see.. but caged up? really? the boy must have done SOMETHING to scare the dog into protective mode....... so to state the dog was not in any way harmed, how would you know??
 
Everyone, the dog in the link is a hybrid WOLFdog, not a normal domesticated dog. Not very good animal to be around the children and there is a reason why it was in a cage as the law required all wolfdogs to be contained properly.
 
a friend has a wolf dog, great dog to! told me it hasent hurt any one... 8 or so years old to.... ( i think? ) wolf dog or not, why wasent anyone watching the kid?!
 
a friend has a wolf dog, great dog to! told me it hasent hurt any one... 8 or so years old to.... ( i think? ) wolf dog or not, why wasent anyone watching the kid?!
Your friend most likely have a false wolfdog....very few states that let you keep wolfdogs legally.
 
nope, straight out wolf X domesticated dog... or so he told me.. i have never seen a wolf X dog before i seen his so i wouldnt know if its true or not.
 
a friend has a wolf dog, great dog to! told me it hasent hurt any one... 8 or so years old to.... ( i think? ) wolf dog or not, why wasent anyone watching the kid?!

True wolf dogs are quite dangerous because the wolf part of the dog has a predisposition to challenge their owner at a certain age to become pack leader which is why those who own wolf dogs that are 50% or more wolf need to be very strong pack leaders who can stand up to their dog


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
Most well-behaved wolfdogs usually don't have any true wolf blood in them. If someone sold your family a wolfdog, it's probably a husky x german shepherd which is common crossbred and usually labelled them as a wolfdog to scamming people believe that they have a true wolfdog. The best way to see if you have a wolfdog or not is by feeding it a commerical dogfood. If it eats the dogfood, its a dog...if it do not eats the dogfood, you have a true wolfdog as the pure wolves and the wolfdogs do not do well on the commericial dog foods.

We owned the parents

Sent from my DROID RAZR using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
nope, straight out wolf X domesticated dog... or so he told me.. i have never seen a wolf X dog before i seen his so i wouldnt know if its true or not.
It's most likely a husky x german shepherd as there are many dog breeds that looks like a wolf, it's easy to make a dog looks like a wolf and sell it to you as a "wolfdog"....in my experiences as there is a general rule....if a wolfdog is well behaved and hasn't hurt anyone, it is a false wolfdog. True wolfdogs tend to be hard to be trained and often have behavioral problems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com