Has anyone tried this process here:
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitst...dfield_Saltwater_Cichlids_2004.pdf?sequence=1
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitst...dfield_Saltwater_Cichlids_2004.pdf?sequence=1
Interesting artical.
There was a member on here last year that was trying to convert Mayans (Cichlasoma urophthalmus) to full saltwater. I dont know what ever came of it.
Cichlids have evolved from a wrasse like salt water fish and I have always found the study of the evolution of cichlids very interesting. However when ever I bring it up or post something about it the thread just lays there and dies a slow death, perhaps this thread will have the same fate. There is also a thread about the successful breeding of Central and South American cichlids which was long thought to be an impossibility (Umbi & Festae not withstanding). Many Central American cichlids live in water with a high Ph and hardness closer to that which you find in the Rift lakes of Africa than that which is normally associated new world species. The white-lipped Talapia (Oreochromis alcalica) lives in the highly saline Lake Natron and Lake Bahi in the northern rift valley where the ph is around 9 to 10 and temperatures that hover around 100 +/- degrees. So these fish (cichlids) are much more adaptable than we think in many cases. Although this is an example of fish that have adapted to this environment over a millennium it is worth mentioning here.
While some central American cichlids are more acceptable of higher levels of salinity than others, and may in fact be able to survive in full salt water, I think (and this is only my opinion) in the wild if the situation presented itself they would be capable of moving between the two as Mayans have been observed doing. They may (they being many species of cichlid), out of necessity be capable of moving between fresh to brackish and in some cases full salt and back but not live in full saltwater for an extended period of time. This is why converting many species of cichlid to full salt water may not be practical, in the wild they may move from one medium to another but not say there permanently. Cichlids are a very successful family as a whole and have adapted to fill many niches in various conditions throughout the world. What they are capable of as far as adaptability given enough time may prove to be limitless. This doesnt mean we can expect to see a Jack Dempsey swimming around in a reef tank any time soon.
The main reason I don't do saltwater is the extra maintenance and cost. Not sure why anyone would take something simple and make it more complicated, time consuming and more expensive when it isn't necessary or beneficial.



...Speaking my language somewhat. I've had a few vicariance vs. marine dispersal cichlid origin forum discussions, etc. but it's normally either pretty esoteric or of only passing interest for most members of most fish forums ime. Part of a larger subject on which I have scores of references and have written many pages, but still takes a fair investment of time and thought to discuss in a forum setting, partly because the whole cichlid origin subject is one with more than one theory when you get to reading non-hobbyist academic sources.Cichlids have evolved from a wrasse like salt water fish and I have always found the study of the evolution of cichlids very interesting. However when ever I bring it up or post something about it the thread just lays there and dies a slow death
My thoughts exactly.
I also can't think of any saltwater fish that would compliment the fish named temperament wise. so you would have loan fresh water fish in a SW aquarium. i understand wanting to try to it to see if it can be done. But I don't think it is something that should be done.