http://aquascienceresearch.com/APInfo/Acclimate.htm
http://aquamaniacs.net/forum/cms_view_article.php?aid=32
The ammonia is not as toxic to the fish at the lower pH that was caused by the increase in disolved CO2 that occurred during shipping (fish breathes, CO2 in water goes up, lowering pH - O2 packed in the bag stops much of this CO2 from the leaving the water). Open the bag, the disolved CO2 escapes, and the pH rises, causing the ammonia in the bag to become more toxic. Temperature shocks are not an issue when a fish is going to warmer water; if your tank is colder than the shipping water, then I'd definitely consider some sort of temperature acclimitization.
So I guess in short there's hard science facts to back up the squirt and dump method (actual chemical reactions/properties in relation to fish health and biology), rather than essentially heresay about the drip method, and 'it worked for me' evidence.
Why expose your fish to the foul, bacteria laden water for longer than it has to be?
http://aquamaniacs.net/forum/cms_view_article.php?aid=32
The ammonia is not as toxic to the fish at the lower pH that was caused by the increase in disolved CO2 that occurred during shipping (fish breathes, CO2 in water goes up, lowering pH - O2 packed in the bag stops much of this CO2 from the leaving the water). Open the bag, the disolved CO2 escapes, and the pH rises, causing the ammonia in the bag to become more toxic. Temperature shocks are not an issue when a fish is going to warmer water; if your tank is colder than the shipping water, then I'd definitely consider some sort of temperature acclimitization.
So I guess in short there's hard science facts to back up the squirt and dump method (actual chemical reactions/properties in relation to fish health and biology), rather than essentially heresay about the drip method, and 'it worked for me' evidence.
Why expose your fish to the foul, bacteria laden water for longer than it has to be?