Am I Crazy or Could This Possibly Work? - Goodbye Water Changes

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

Angelphish

Potamotrygon
MFK Member
Dec 13, 2015
3,742
1,683
164
Georgia
I was looking into options for nitrate reduction earlier today because I was curious as to how low maintenance a large tank could actually be. I was surprised by everything that was available for aquariums, and that most of it was compatible with freshwater. I gathered everything available for freshwater nitrate removal, and I think it may be enough to remove the need for water changes, or at least nitrate related water changes.

With college being just a few years away, I want to make my tank as low maintenance as possible for my parents. Hopefully all they will have to do is feed the fish, and clean the nitrate equipment or replace media 2-3 each year. I plan to have enough equipment to not have any single piece of overworked; preferably they'll all be underworked to keep them cleaner, help the media last longer, and to reduce maintenance for each individual piece of equipment.

Even if college won't interfere with my maintenance schedule or vice versa, I would still like to give myself more free time, as I basically have none between aquarium maintenance and honors/AP classes.

The equipment/materials/supplies I found on BRS that I plan to use are:



1 cubic foot of 2" Marinepure Ceramic Biomedia Cubes



CW-300 Algae Scrubber
Skimz 528gph Quietpro 2.0
Save A Watt P4472



Skimz RR153 Recirculating Biopellet Reactor
1 Gallon BRS Bulk Biopellets



Skimz Monzter NM152 Nitrate Reactor
Caribsea Live Sulfur Media
Milwaukee MC510 ORP controller



Ozotech Poseidon 220 kit:
220mg/hr Ozotech Poseidon generator
large air dryer with beads
milwaukee MC510 ORP controller



BRS 6 Stage 150gpd RO/DI System
1/2" Normally Closed Valve
Tunze Osmolator Unviversal 3155 ATO
Tunze Osmolator Switched Socket Outlet
Float Switch
Lifeguard Quiet One Pro 800
Misc container for RO/DI waste water - Likely a barrel or storage bin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I plan to have the ozone at the beginning of the sump, in the same compartment as the filter socks. This section should have the most flow, and should give the ozone enough time to gas out before it reaches the bio media. If it doesn't have enough time/flow to gas out, then the waterfall from the filter sock section to the biomedia section should remove the rest. I'm also considering an ozone reactor, so the ozone may gas out before it even reaches the sump. I read that the ideal ORP for ozone is 350-400, so I'll try to keep it at 375.

The simplest part is the Marinepure media. I'll just place it in a low flow area of the sump and the anaerobic bacteria should grow

The biopellet reactor will be in the last section of the sump with the return pump; mainly because that's the only place in the sump that has enough room to fit it. The Biopellet reactor setup should be pretty simple. I'll have a Skimz RR153 Biopellet reactor using 5 cups of BRS Bio Pellets.

The CW-300 Algae scrubber will be ran outside of the sump by a Skimz Quiet Pro 2.0 528gph pump. The pump will once again be in the return pump section of the sump for space reasons. The Algae scrubber's lights will be on a 12 hr timer, 8pm-8am.

The sulfur nitrate filter is where is gets complicated. I plan to use a Skimz Monzter NM152 Nitrate Reactor with 1.75 liters of Caribsea Live Sulfur Media. I will use the Milaukee MC510 ORP controller to keep the ORP between -200 and -150. I've read that below -200 ORP means there isn't enough flow, and above -150 ORP means there is too much flow. Assuming this is true, I'll try to keep the ORP at -175.

The most complicated part will be the fully automated auto top off system. I plan to have the RO/DI connect to the tap, with a normally open/closed (whichever is cheaper. Either will work, all I have to do is flip the detectors for the ATO depending on which one I use) blocking water from entering the RO/DI. When enough water evaporates, the ATO will feed power to the normally closed valve, which will then open; filling the sump with new RO/DI water. Once the sump is full, the ATO will turn off, the valve will close, and the RO/DI will stop filling the sump. The waste water from the RO/DI will enter a container, where I'll just use a float switch to power the Lifeguard Quiet Pro One rather than another full ATO system, as I don't mind DIYing this part to save $200, and I don't need the other functions of an RO/DI. The Lifeguard pump will then pump the water into the drain line for the 210 water changes, which then takes the water outside. This allows me to use pre-existing plumbing rather than having to plumb another separate drain line. The RO/DI system should prevent the hardness from increasing, thus fully removing the need for water changes.

Now here's my main question - Am I crazy or could this system actually work?

Are there any changes I need to make to what I've explained so far, or anything that I missed? Are there any incompatibilities with the equipment I plan to use? Will this be enough to remove all the nitrate from my 210 (and 75g sump that I usually keep nearly full)? All the nitrate removal equipment is rated for ~400 gallons (Nitrate Reactor: up to 396 gallons, Algae Scrubber: up to 400 gallons, Biopellet Reactor: up to 415 gallons, Ozone Generator: up to 440 gallons (I read that most manufactures recommend 0.5mg/hr per gallon, so since Ozotech didn't list a max rating, I assumed it was 440 gallons)).

I know I can DIY everything for a lot cheaper, but I want this entire system to be as user friendly as possible, and take less time than water changes, or at least take less time in one period than water changes (40 minutes 3 days weekly vs. 2 hours 1 day weekly).

If there are cheaper ways to do this, then please list them, but I'd prefer it not be DIY, because everything needs to be simple, and the few more complicated parts should be easy to remember. I know drip systems are an option that can give similar if not the same results, but my Dad is strongly opposed to this idea. He thinks he can do it cheaper and simpler, but his idea ended up being more complicated, and less effective.

This will be a long process, as I'm not sure how much of this I need to pay for myself, so don't expect updates on this any time soon. Thoughts and suggestions are appreciated.

J jaws7777 kno4te kno4te markstrimaran markstrimaran Tomt37 Tomt37 tarheel96 tarheel96 Fish Tank Travis Fish Tank Travis You may be interested in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Umm no. Hardness will crash, PH will crash, tank will crash. Basic chemistry here, nitrogen cycle acidifies the water, last time I checked you have a lot of fish that prefer high protein foods so it won't buffer forever. Also hormone buildup may be an issue eventually? Not 100% sure on that bit but may be an issue in a totally enclosed system

What is your waters Kh anyway? That's pivotal to this
 
Umm no. Hardness will crash, PH will crash, tank will crash. Basic chemistry here, nitrogen cycle acidifies the water, last time I checked you have a lot of fish that prefer high protein foods so it won't buffer forever. Also hormone buildup may be an issue eventually? Not 100% sure on that bit but may be an issue in a totally enclosed system

What is your waters Kh anyway? That's pivotal to this
The kH is 3.
 
The kH is 3.
RO wate won't get you anywhere good then, so I'd be careful. You've got to find a way to keep your Gh and Kh stable, as well as deal with the whole myriad of other dissolved organics building up.

Maybe duanes duanes will know
 
Honestly the first thing that springs to my eye here is that, at that price, you could install a heavy drip and it would take about 40 years to cost you as much money as what you've planned.
Like I said earlier in the post, my Dad is strongly opposed to a drip system, and I wouldn't be able to get one...
 
Some seachem replenish may help with RO water or mixing half RO water with some tap.

In case looking down this road.
 
RO wate won't get you anywhere good then, so I'd be careful. You've got to find a way to keep your Gh and Kh stable, as well as deal with the whole myriad of other dissolved organics building up.

Maybe duanes duanes will know
Ozone removes/kills dissolved organics, and I don't think adding RO water to replace evaporated water will affect the gH or kH for the same reason why you don't add salt to ATO water in saltwater aquariums. The only thing that evaporates is the water, the salt stays in the tank. As long as my gH and kH are fine in the beginning, adding RO water to compensate for evaporation shouldn't change it. Only if I used it for water changes.

As for pH, I can connect a dosing pump to a pH controller and it will dose Seachem Oasis Pond pH buffer whenever the pH gets too low. It can't overdose because the pH buffer will be dosed near the pH probe, and the water near the probe will have a higher pH. The pump won't dose again until the pH of the water around the probe is lower than 7, but it will only read lower than 7 once the buffer is diluted and it needs to dose more, or until the nitrification cycle lowers the pH again.
 
Look up Diana Waldstad and her book, Ecology of the Planted Aquarium. I must admit that I am yet to read it, but i have a pretty good idea of what's in it. She offers a way to go almost maintenance free. Aquaponics helps too.
As Hendre Hendre said, any system that will work over a long period of time will need something to replenish metals in the water column and buffer the ph. Diana Walstad uses shells, bones and potting soil to accomplish this, there are other ways. I saw a discus tank on Youtube (bad reference, I know) whose owner said he ran it for six years with a heavily planted sump and something like three WCs. Using something he called 'Miracle Mud', for this purpose that he said was marketed for reef tanks. I can't find the video now, but there are plenty of no WC discus tanks on Youtube.
 
Last edited:
MonsterFishKeepers.com