Another nut with a gun.

[pops]

I do not hunt, never have, not my cup of tea, I have no use for a AK style weapon, or a long rifle. I have my conceal carry weapon, for only one purpose. I target practice with it. work on my draw and presentation with it for only one purpose. Its a tool that I hope I will never have to use. some nut job want to ruin my day he best be good at what he is doing.

 

[pops]

It is surprising that most folks have no ideal what the 2A is all about.

 

[jaws7777]

Speaking of wacky,CNN had some wacko professor on the other day calling for a repeal of the 2A.

Hahaha and what was his solution for illegal weapons already on the streets.

2A covers what area of the ammendment?

 

[pops]

the right to bear arms for the purpose of arming a oneself against the threat of unlawful government.

 

[krichardson]

Hahaha and what was his solution for illegal weapons already on the streets.

2A covers what area of the ammendment?

The entire second amendment and I doubt if the jackass has given much thought to the weapons on the street.
I don't hunt either and don't plan to anytime soon but I certainly don't like the idea of knee jerk politrikians taking away rights of law abiding citizens.

 

[pops]

with out the second amendment, we would have no way to protect our civil rights. you might as well burn the constitution.

 

[jaws7777]

with out the second amendment, we would have no way to protect our civil rights. you might as well burn the constitution.

I wasnt aware 2A stood for s specific motion. The overall ammendment was studied as a kid in school and followed up on as an adult. I'd bet they dont even teach this anymore in schools

 

[pops]

the ideal of it also covering self defense came later, but was not the original intent.

 

[jaws7777]

The entire second amendment and I doubt if the jackass has given much thought to the weapons on the street.
I don't hunt either and don't plan to anytime soon but I certainly don't like the idea of knee jerk politrikians taking away rights of law abiding citizens.

Guy could have easily used a pipe bomb.

I gotta say i do agree with no fly no buy, but i have a feeling once the dems wrap their heads around the ramifications of that, they'll probably sink it

the ideal of it also covering self defense came later, but was not the original intent.

Yup first and foremost was defense against a tyrannical gvt. I remember there also being an issue over militia's and common folk or something

 

[pops]

yup, the right to own property, the right to protect that property against all threats, foreign or domestic.