Apology to MFK

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
neoprodigy;539836; said:
these "forum war" has become buncha silly games... you should see some of the emails and pm from the staff over there.... just plain silly....
Li, I agree with you on the first point, but your second comment really doesn't help matters. Your personal beefs with certain WW staff members should not be aired publicly. I know that I'm not one of those staff members to which you refer, but it still strikes me as disingenuous for you to act as if you have been a peaceful by-stander in these matters while you're openly criticizing WW staff members. :(

No worries, Li. I've said my piece. I will still feed you beers at the 2007 ACA Convention. :)
 
I think there has always been too much drama between the boards. But after I have made a stand, one way or another, I would never apologize for it. That is what America is about being able to speak your piece. If you get banned for something you feel strongly about, so be it.
 
armac;540101; said:
But after I have made a stand, one way or another, I would never apologize for it.

What if you see in retrospect that you were wrong :confused:
 
icthyophile;540076; said:
Li, I agree with you on the first point, but your second comment really doesn't help matters. Your personal beefs with certain WW staff members should not be aired publicly. I know that I'm not one of those staff members to which you refer, but it still strikes me as disingenuous for you to act as if you have been a peaceful by-stander in these matters while you're openly criticizing WW staff members. :(

No worries, Li. I've said my piece. I will still feed you beers at the 2007 ACA Convention. :)

It burns me to read posts like this. It strikes me as a bit hypocritical. Specially when Li asked you to stop the bashing at a thread in your affiliated site and you did nothing ... Well, you did close it... after 6 days .
 
redtailfool;540223; said:
It burns me to read posts like this. It strikes me as a bit hypocritical. Specially when Li asked you to stop the bashing at a thread in your affiliated site and you did nothing ... Well, you did close it... after 6 days .
There were no names mentioned in that thread. Had Li's name been mentioned, I'd have closed it immediately. I did close it after Li's name was mentioned several days later. Also, I'm rarely online during the weekends, so I may have neglected to do so during the weekend or merely assumed that the thread had "died." Regardless, I did close it.
 
Guys, this is a thread about peace, not war ...


:cheers:
 
icthyophile;540076; said:
Li, I agree with you on the first point, but your second comment really doesn't help matters. Your personal beefs with certain WW staff members should not be aired publicly. I know that I'm not one of those staff members to which you refer, but it still strikes me as disingenuous for you to act as if you have been a peaceful by-stander in these matters while you're openly criticizing WW staff members.
No worries, Li. I've said my piece. I will still feed you beers at the 2007 ACA Convention.

icthyophile;540254; said:
There were no names mentioned in that thread. Had Li's name been mentioned, I'd have closed it immediately. I did close it after Li's name was mentioned several days later. Also, I'm rarely online during the weekends, so I may have neglected to do so during the weekend or merely assumed that the thread had "died." Regardless, I did close it.



You know I will reply to your post... sorry if i dont sugar coat my words....

Well jesse... about that little outburst.... i should block out the name next time.. now i know thanks for the tip ;) if you just close the thread like i asked you to... none of this bs will happen...

you are always here to preach about "being neutral" and "peace in the community..." but somehow you always assume who did what on your affiliated site... without mentioning names of course ;)

you love to be in a controversial thread like this... how about a simple usual icthyophile reply like "i will not touch this thread with a 10 foot pole". Maybe you are trying too hard to please your admins....

Also before i pm'ed you.. i did ask another staff to close it... which he did... wanna guess who re-opened it for couple extra giggles?


icthyophile said:
There were no names mentioned in that thread.
So its ok to bash someone just as long as "no names mentioned"? You know darn well that thread was target at me. if not ,then you were probably born last night not back in '69....


icthyophile said:
I did close it after Li's name was mentioned several days later. Also, I'm rarely online during the weekends,
my name was mention on a THURSDAY!!! the same day i pm you and took you 5+ days to close it?


icthyophile said:
merely assumed that the thread had "died."
assumptions are mother of f-ups... arent you a lawyer or something? check the thread.... didnt you made 2 replies right after i pm you? will that be an act of keeping the thread alive?


icthyophile said:
Regardless, I did close it.
you want a cookie now?


i have attached the whole pm coversation... as you can see... i asked you nicely to close it... but instead you called it "harmless" and it's no use talking to you about issues... arent you a GlobalMod? or worry about getting kicked off from the staff? :eek:


neoprodigy said:
it not politics... its making it more peaceful... :)
dont you want that? guess not (my assumptions btw) ....


if you want peace in the community.. the admins gotta talk... for example i asked trey to look into a questionable signature... its been 2 weeks nothing from him...

im open to all talks... but all your admins got Xiao Lan Jiao..... enuff said... they either block me from IM or not picking up the phone.... guess they still wanna play games....

about the beer thing at aca 2007... i might have to take a rain check.... because i just recieved a very interesting pm... but i will save it from another rainy day..... and i will block the username this time.....

Oh Yea, MonsterFishKeepers all the way :)

jesse.jpg
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com