Next we will see a news item that the couple has come down with a bad case of dropsy.The arowana was sick and they still ate it lol
Other than the realization that Asian arowana are basically completely gone from the wild and the majority of what is left is run in breeding ponds on fish farms, I'd say it's mildly distasteful. They wouldn't be on CITIES and hold their current status in the IUCN if they were plentifulI find it pretty stupid that this woman would cook an expensive fish like this, and disturbing that she would be so petty as to do it just to spite her husband. Him laughing about it? Not sure how to respond to that; sounds like they make a perfect couple. Being together, they save two other lucky people from being miserable.
But, the idea that it's okay to eat a pacu...or maybe a tilapia...but not this particular fish seems completely hypocritical. Why is this fish's life worth more than that of another fish? Because you can't legally have one of these? Because you can't afford one? Because it's Asian? (That one really puzzles me...}
It's a fish. People eat fish all the time. If a person who keeps fish in a tank feels that eating fish is abhorrent because of some special connection they have, it might be possible to see some weird sort of logic to that...although that would be analogous to a dog-owner refusing to eat the flesh of any mammal. My father would have laughingly referred to that as a "harmless nut-case".
For the life of me, I can't understand the thought process behind this reaction.
But in short, good summary. These people are unhinged and probably a bit behind on a medication regiment. Best to steer clear, and keep ourselves and our arowana far awayI find it pretty stupid that this woman would cook an expensive fish like this, and disturbing that she would be so petty as to do it just to spite her husband. Him laughing about it? Not sure how to respond to that; sounds like they make a perfect couple. Being together, they save two other lucky people from being miserable.
But, the idea that it's okay to eat a pacu...or maybe a tilapia...but not this particular fish seems completely hypocritical. Why is this fish's life worth more than that of another fish? Because you can't legally have one of these? Because you can't afford one? Because it's Asian? (That one really puzzles me...}
It's a fish. People eat fish all the time. If a person who keeps fish in a tank feels that eating fish is abhorrent because of some special connection they have, it might be possible to see some weird sort of logic to that...although that would be analogous to a dog-owner refusing to eat the flesh of any mammal. My father would have laughingly referred to that as a "harmless nut-case".
For the life of me, I can't understand the thought process behind this reaction.
Not a typo. He really got P.O.ed by that fish.
I usually don't eat them unless they get mortally beat up, or some sort of eye, or jaw thing makes them incapacitated.
If you go to some places in Central America, managuense is thought to be one of the most delicious of cichlids, and has been released in other places it is not endemic, because of its delicate taste.
Other than the realization that Asian arowana are basically completely gone from the wild and the majority of what is left is run in breeding ponds on fish farms, I'd say it's mildly distasteful. They wouldn't be on CITIES and hold their current status in the IUCN if they were plentiful
Pacu and tilapia are EVERYWHERE and are also invasive in places like Florida. You don't exactly have an invasive Asian arowana problem