It's not written by the best author. This author let's personal beliefs interfere with scientific study. Though it does contain some facts that single cell evolutionists hate to deal with. It's obvious that species evolve within themselves. a bird .. a bird, a fish.. a fish. But not a fish to a bird. Which is what this book attempts to disprove but has gone about in the wrong fashion. There is evolution just not the type where a big rock explodes, gases form on a planet, a single celled creature comes to life, and then magically everything on the planet evolved from it. That's whimsical, but a far reach.
Why are there no fossils of the "critters" leading up to the cambrian period? A die hard evolutionist will say that their evidence had soft bodies and never fossilized. lol.
I found this amusing as quoted above: "This, at best, reflects a profound failure to understand evolutionary theory." = You fail to understand an educated guess.
Darwin didn't believe in single celled evolution the way people today do. I think he'd be amazed at how people act about his work. The fact is there are a lot of scientists who have questioned evolution and had their careers ruined for it. Isn't science supposed to question everything?? Everything but evolution. There are even more who have serious questions on it but are afraid to talk about it because they don't want to have their careers ruined by people who treat evolution like a religion, and then have the audacity to call you irrational for mentioning religion. Sheep.
