I wont get into the evolution hypothesis subject i always get flamed by people who believe in the "theory" = X
Atlas of Creation by Harun Yahya
- Thread starter mercury904
- Start date
I don't think anyone is arguing that evolution isn't a theory, only that it has loads more evidence which supports it, than this author has to negate it.
How do you explain the existence of modern birds, if there were no animals with feathers that flew, before archaeopteryx?
There were dinosaurs with feathers such as Velociraptor....
For that matter, how would you explain humans, when our fossils only go back so far? Where did we come from?
How do you explain the existence of modern birds, if there were no animals with feathers that flew, before archaeopteryx?
There were dinosaurs with feathers such as Velociraptor....
For that matter, how would you explain humans, when our fossils only go back so far? Where did we come from?
Well understand that I have to debate only with approved arguments. Just because two creatures have similar features do not make them relatives. Convergent evolution = two separate groups of animals developing similar traits to deal with environmental challenges. That would be my answer for the dinosaur bird thing. I'll avoid the second question because it won't lead us anywhere constructive. However you could also ask yourself why, of the millions of life forms on this planet are we the only ones who build airplanes, skyscrapers, computers, etc. Because we are different. That's the reason.
Excellent point, evolution theory is a culmination of many factors which may contribute to it.
So lets say that birds did not evolve from dinosaurs. Where then, do they come from if speaking about humans makes you feel uncomfortable.
As you claimed earlier, birds only evolve from birds, well then why aren't there any bird fossils from before archaeopteryx?
Why do certain species and characteristics disappear from the fossil record the further back in time we reach?
So lets say that birds did not evolve from dinosaurs. Where then, do they come from if speaking about humans makes you feel uncomfortable.
As you claimed earlier, birds only evolve from birds, well then why aren't there any bird fossils from before archaeopteryx?
Why do certain species and characteristics disappear from the fossil record the further back in time we reach?
I don't find enough evidence through fossil records. Most are grouped together by similar traits which is a flaw. The actual answer I can't give you on MFK. However let's state it this way Lets call an era a day. Each "day" more things were brought into being. I am not uncomfortable talking about human beings. It's just that one school of thought is allowed to use any/all information at their disposal. Whether it's factual or not, while the other school of thought has to use the first groups arguments and point out flaws because they aren't allowed mention any information group one might object to. So.....
Oh I absolutely didn't want to go to verbal attacks. However, I am sort of in the middle as I believe parts of both sides. It's just that a full blown debate isn't permitted here. This is something that I don't quite get. I think the point is, if school of thought #2 offends school of thought #1 then it's ok. But if school of thought #1 offends school of thought #2 then its a BIG problem. That's not exactly even keeled.
