i don't understand the idea in this, but there won't be profit made and i don't understand why people are getting upset by it, the sign did stand for the horrors of post war germany, but i would think at the end of the holocaust the entire camp should have been destroyed, mabey germany just wanted it up to make profit from the tourism the camp attracts, any true educational system should be able to educate people about the holocaust, there shouldn't have been the need to have the camp still there, theres plenty of documentary film/pictures, writen words and evidence of the attrosions of these events, i'm kind of insulted germany would keep a symbol of such evil as the camp around after the holocaust was over.
After nazi's kill jews they'd skin them and make lampshades from the skin, being jews were tattoed the shades with the tattoe on them was valuable to the market for them.
sostoudt;3713191; said:exactly, i heard people of people collecting tattoos from the era, when i say tattoos i mean actual tattoos with the skin.
if people buy pieces of dead skin for historical and collection value, im sure some one will pay for that sign.
After nazi's kill jews they'd skin them and make lampshades from the skin, being jews were tattoed the shades with the tattoe on them was valuable to the market for them.