Not mocking. Just wanted to point out that what you said in red is not true.krichardson;4927682; said:No indo is as outgoing and active...
Not mocking. Just wanted to point out that what you said in red is not true.krichardson;4927682; said:No indo is as outgoing and active...
Which one is which? Nevermind, I see it now.jcardona1;4927794; said:Here's something that another member here pointed out; that in his experience, ITs always have a 'bulge' on this bar seen here. The chaopraya Pulcher never does. Just to add more confusion to this '3-bar indo' vs Cambodian Pulcher debate
View attachment 589684
View attachment 589685
I didn't say that the indo is not,just not as much as the other fish and that I think is true.I'm not trying to pick a fight or start an argument here as I can't be sure just what these fish are.I'm just bringing up points and observations of my own to add to this very interesting discussion.I'm not taking one side or the other.bomber;4927784; said:Not mocking. Just wanted to point out that what you said in red is not true.
jcardona1;4927794; said:Here's something that another member here pointed out; that in his experience, ITs always have a 'bulge' on this bar seen here. The chaopraya Pulcher never does. Just to add more confusion to this '3-bar indo' vs Cambodian Pulcher debate
View attachment 589684
View attachment 589685
prskiller;4927795; said:ST from here:
![]()
BTW, I bought one. ST or not it looks close enough for me and looks way better than the IT I now have.![]()
Coues;4927691; said:Very true.
As far as them being eaten, I'd imagine not many will reach the dinner plate when they are fetching $400+ for a 3" fish here in the states.