baby ST

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
rclark12;3775408; said:
yeah i got the same picture to be used for reference, its not actualy the st your supplier may have
confront the supplier about it, thts what i did and everything was worked out
The thread that you started was closed.

Keep us in the loop... we are all waiting for the news.
 
rclark12;3775408; said:
yeah i got the same picture to be used for reference, its not actualy the st your supplier may have
confront the supplier about it, thts what i did and everything was worked out

if everything was worked out you must have got some pictures as it takes just as long to take a picture of the actual fish as it does to look around the net for baby ST pictures

i would be very unhappy if for some reason the supplier was not providing me with pictures ST have to be one of the easyest fish to photo you hold them in your hand and they dont flap around

when are you getting them
 
:screwy:
Scorponok;3801949; said:
You are kidding, right? That's an IT and I have an exact looking fish.
 
Scorponok;3802997; said:
Dixon had the real ST but not Tikaman. Just campare the first baby ST pic to his pic. The second pic has an IT tail.


T1's picture is also of an ST, he still has it and its now huge.
 
Scorponok;3802997; said:
Dixon had the real ST but not Tikaman. Just campare the first baby ST pic to his pic. The second pic has an IT tail.

another new expert :grinno:

what is this IT or ST

P1000559.jpg


its the same fish
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com