I inkslinger Gambusia MFK Member Mar 21, 2011 161 5 18 East Freetown , MA Jun 11, 2011 #11 swk said: http://www.fosterandsmithaquatics.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=5163+5187+14421&pcatid=14421 Click to expand... That is not the same as the japanese pond filter mats witch coast over $125. http://koienterprise.com/Filter-Media/Japanese-Filter-Mat-p-51.html
swk said: http://www.fosterandsmithaquatics.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=5163+5187+14421&pcatid=14421 Click to expand... That is not the same as the japanese pond filter mats witch coast over $125. http://koienterprise.com/Filter-Media/Japanese-Filter-Mat-p-51.html
Spiritofthesoul Jack Dempsey MFK Member Dec 3, 2010 4,692 19 38 33 Singapore Jun 12, 2011 #12 WyldFya said: Seachem matrix ~7535 square feet, versus Eheim's 18,300 square feet. Click to expand... Not proven by external parties
WyldFya said: Seachem matrix ~7535 square feet, versus Eheim's 18,300 square feet. Click to expand... Not proven by external parties
I inkslinger Gambusia MFK Member Mar 21, 2011 161 5 18 East Freetown , MA Jun 24, 2011 #13 Will you get the same filtration if you use the normal Seachem Matrix instead of Seachem Pond Matrix
R reptileguy2727 Feeder Fish MFK Member Dec 12, 2005 850 1 0 Northern Virginia Jun 24, 2011 #14 I would go with Seachem Matrix, more bioavailable surface area and may allow for denitrification.