Chemtrails

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
we'll never know the real truth. all i know is that 9/11 was an inside job if not we knew it was gonna happen and let it happen. if i remember correctly larry silverstein inherited billions of dollars when his building tower 7 fell. 9/11 was a setup so that we can invade iraq and go to war with them. theres so many info on 9/11 if you research it. the official story in the news is bs and its what THEY want you to believe.

if a plane DID hit the pentagon as they said it did....why not show a vid of it hitting the pentagon? yet they only showed 1 vid far away from a gas station that does not show a plane hitting it what so ever but just a explosion. they have vids but will not show it..but why? whats there to hide if a plane did hit it? that would kill all conspiracies about the no plane theory.

9/11 wasnt the first false flag by the U.S. look up operation northwood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
 
meghanashley;4229437; said:
Huge real estate prospects, sale of those buildings closed a month before (not saying I really buy that) but I was disappointed that Silverstein filed a lawsuit against the airlines for damages done to the building, that was pretty douche.

Who knows, its uncomprehenible to me, but it's very odd for a steel frame building to fall from fire, especially one that wasn't buring that long.
Click to expand...

indeed, if i remember correctly or maybe im wrong. but no big building has ever collapsed due to fire. the twin towers and tower 7 are the first.
 
Think about how counter-productive it would be for a Government that is empowered by a people/country to attack itself.
And for the purpose to be so that it could go to war in Iraq? Think about the massive change in perception that happened with 9-11, the US was no longer invincible, and that it didn't take tons of money and a huge army to do it.
I'm sorry, but to think that they would deal themselves (remember, they are supported by the country itself) such a damaging blow, is way too far fetched.
They would basically be saying, "ok, I'm going to rip my own arm off, but I'm going to blame it on this guy over here, so I can beat him with my severed arm".
 
More like ripping off your arm saying john so and so did it, but that we are going to smack john's neighbor for doing so. I get what your saying and right after it happened it was far too emotional for me when people brought up theories about it, it would make me angry that they would think such a thing. but today I can say that I find some details about 9/11 very un-nerving.
 
Can you explain how making it rain makes it harder for the vietcong to fight? That comment made no sense.
 
Citrinellus;4229426; said:
Can you explain to me what the government could gain from doing inside jobs and destroying these places? I could guess it was to gain support to go to war, wouldn't one bomb be sufficient? Why destroy all these places if they only had to, blow up the pentagon?
Click to expand...
Because they wanted to go to the war with the middle east, for the oil. That's why the government blew up it's own building and killed thousands of people. Also, the there is a Vatican conspiracy, planning to merge all religions together, to worship Satan. The moon doesn't exist, it's just the other side of the sun. And Paul McCartney is dead, he wasn't wearing shoes on the cover of Abbey Road ;)

[/sarcasm]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom