Gatorxxx420;4554662; said:
I agree with this, it's hard to gauge just how mean each fish will be. Typically Red Devils and Midas will be your meanest. But there is always that one exception here and there. Just like there is always that rare exception that an EBJD is a mean fish. I have one that holds it's own against my Carpintis and very mean BGJD. But none of them compare to my Red Dragon Flowerhorn. He's a solo fish because he can't play well with others. My BGJD and RDFH have both killed tank mates more than once.
Let's look at Gatorxxx's post. It highlights some of the flaws of a gathering data for a scale/rating system. I agree with what he is saying, and mean no disrespect.
He says the Red Devils and Midas will be your meanest. So hypothetically we would say he is rating them as a 9 or 10.
Someone who has owned Dovii, Cubans, Umbees as well as Midas may think that this is way off and could rate a dovii as a 10, Cubans at 8 and Midas at 6.
Also, he is saying his Red Dragon FH is above and beyond mean. Which I agree, FH are aggro as heck. But do we include hybrids in the scale? A Red Texas might be more mild mannered than a ZZ, etc
bbortko;4555045; said:
If you collect. a large enough data pool, you'll achieve accuracy. My biggest concerned is unqualified people chiming in, for example I picked up a rotkeil 3 weeks ago and it is the only severum I've ever had so obviously I have no business giving my opinion severum.
This is true. It would take a lot of data, from expierienced aquarists. Look at the CA/SA Agression sticky. On the first page you have people saying that Oscars and Firemouths are the meanest. Some Oscars are mean, some are softies and get beat up by fish 1/3 of thier size. I would list both of them in the low on my list.
But I havent owned dovii, umbee, cubans, etc, etc so I wouldnt feel comfortable trying to rate them