Could these be Widebars????

[Bogwoodbruce]

Indos, nice grab

They were very cheap for there size where i live.

 

[Fishes33]

I think I understand y they said Skylar's pic is a widebar.. is it because the tail section.. the middle of the last 3 bar never touch the bottom? (cause when that fish grow, that bar got splitted?)

 

[TCZeli]

looks like 3 full bars to me, my guess would be that the pic your talking about is an indo

 

[Bogwoodbruce]

Whatever they are i'm very happy with them.

 

[DiXoN]

the best thing to do is to get pictures of both sides,you will need full flank shots and decent quality pics.

 

[Bogwoodbruce]

the best thing to do is to get pictures of both sides,you will need full flank shots and decent quality pics.

I'll have a try mate.

 

[vinson lim]

I dont really get it.. so whats make the difference between that dat and the one skylar posted? their middle bar is narrow in the body..

can you guys edit skylar pic to show the difference?

first pic is from bogwood, second pic is from skylar

in the other thread, people said this is a widebar (because of the middle narrow in bar).. but bogwood's pic show the dat's middle bar is also narrowed in..

Exactly, this is wat i am thinking too...

This is a good point.

can someone shed some light ?

 

[vinson lim]

waiting for a further pic.

 

[marvinbaker]

personally i'd like someone to tell me what definitely makes the tiger by skylar a widebar as i'd say that it's an indo.

check out the id chart in the sticky:

http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=54277&page=3

the bars at the tail are both incorrect to be a widebar.