navygirl76;2865010; said:
what part is crap? The whole monster bit or the undiscovered animal being mistaken as a "monster" part?
I can believe the latter.
cryptozoology thread
- Thread starter Bottomfeeder
- Start date
what part is crap? The whole monster bit or the undiscovered animal being mistaken as a "monster" part?
I can believe the latter.
the blue ape things in Evolution are pretty freaky.
If i go wandering around the scrub at night i get pretty freaked out of bunyips/yowies!
If i go wandering around the scrub at night i get pretty freaked out of bunyips/yowies!
i dont believe the Loch Ness is deep enough to hide a monster of that size. thats all. not saying it couldnt have been a long eel like fish that died long ago-but its by no means a "monster" or undiscovered dinosaur. lol.. i have never seen any plausible pictures either..
Bottomfeeder;2864110; said:
i kinda agree with bigfoot. i mean Mountain Gorillas werent discovered until up about 100 yrs ago and werent described till about 50 yrs later...i believe
Mountain Gorillas weren't "discovered" until 1902 by Europeans. African natives had coexisted with them for eons. Kind of like saying that Columbus "discovered" the "New World".
