Ct vs indo 3 bar

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Eh,three,is that enough?.I've never owed any though lol and I did not say that the pulchers bars do not fade.
So according to you, pulcher bars do not fade. Pulcher bars do not fade out the way that indos do. So, Pulcher bars must fade IN then...
 
So according to you, pulcher bars do not fade. Pulcher bars do not fade out the way that indos do. So, Pulcher bars must fade IN then...

If that's what your understanding of my post is then have at it.
 
The reason CT is cleaner, because they were hand picked out of the group, before labeled and sold

Winner winner chicken dinner. Datnoids have become the new cichla when it comes to price gouging and rediculous marketing.
 
LOL...Why,whatever do you mean?
 
I can't speak for everyone but this whole CT/IT thing is a nonstop source of debate. I equate it with the cichla hype of years past where a fancy, and often time fictitious, label yields blatant price gouging.

I spoke to a bunch of industry big wigs at the convention over the weekend and everyone said the same thing. CTs are just select grade indos. These pics just solidify my stance.
 
i've had a nice stable 3 bar indo and CT both at same size 11/12". i can honestly tell you that the CT is the real deal. CT is deep golden and bars is solid black and bold, never faded. the Indo was a lighter gold and stable, but bars always fade in and out during water changes and whether or not the lights on.

not here to argue or debate, just my 2 cents. i'll try to dig up some old photos

So are ct always stable or not?
I was buying a ct the other day and seen that the bars was not dark and started to get darker and the price was over 1k clearly didn't want to spend that much money on a dat I wasn't sure if it was a ct or not...


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com