DAT ID..

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
ZOO YORK 207;719812; said:
Still looks like a IT to me. Too many bars.

I think so too... not callin anyone a liar, buttttt....

Id sell it as a ST too if i ordered it offline for that price and it turned out to be a IT. JKJKJK;)
 
NEW PIC... WHats this one??? swears its a ST...

Picture borrowed from (Estubby)

PICT0004.JPG
 
AquataHolic420;719882; said:
NEW PIC... WHats this one??? swears its a ST...

Picture borrowed from (Estubby)

Again, to me, it looks like an IT
 
vanimate;719886; said:
Again, to me, it looks like an IT

hha ****.. wheres that tail marking picture for the Dat species... can someone post it?? Ill look now!
 
AquataHolic420;719890; said:
hha ****.. wheres that tail marking picture for the Dat species... can someone post it?? Ill look now!

Sticky in this dat forum ;)
 
anybody interested... the dude wants 250$ for each Dat one at 5" and another at 9".. both supposedly ST bought from Rarefish. The guy is selling the fish on www.bostonreefers.org BUY IT if u DARE!

Given all you MFK'ers a heads up!:naughty: :naughty: :naughty:
 
islander671;720347; said:
Hard to tell, but i think its a Cambodian Tiger which i believe is still a D. Pulcher like the ST.

Im confused.. is it worth 250$ bottomline? I dont think so what you guys think?
 
The first one with the split bars looks like a D. pulcher to me. I don't have a good enough view of the side of the second dat to determine whether it's D. pulcher or D. microlepis.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com