Bogwoodbruce Peacock Bass MFK Member Feb 2, 2007 27,290 13 119 33 Rotherham, UK www.facebook.com Oct 2, 2007 #11 Yep the name has been changed. I prefer the new one.
T TROY25 Feeder Fish MFK Member Sep 10, 2005 110 0 0 Singapore Oct 3, 2007 #12 dbenson;1167900; said: I believe the Genus "Coius" is out of date. It is Datniodes polota. Click to expand... Yes. it was changed to Datnioides Polota
dbenson;1167900; said: I believe the Genus "Coius" is out of date. It is Datniodes polota. Click to expand... Yes. it was changed to Datnioides Polota
D.Pulcher Gambusia MFK Member Sep 11, 2007 209 2 16 Las Vegas, Nv Oct 4, 2007 #13 So what exactly should I be putting in my sig? Not silvers but NTT
T TCZeli Fire Eel MFK Member Jun 27, 2007 1,388 3 68 NJ Oct 4, 2007 #14 D.Pulcher;1174688; said: So what exactly should I be putting in my sig? Not silvers but NTT Click to expand... Datnoid, not Coius Coius is no longer a valid name for any of the 5 tiger fish species.
D.Pulcher;1174688; said: So what exactly should I be putting in my sig? Not silvers but NTT Click to expand... Datnoid, not Coius Coius is no longer a valid name for any of the 5 tiger fish species.
K KenyanSandBoa Feeder Fish MFK Member Feb 20, 2007 1,889 2 0 45 Massachusetts Oct 4, 2007 #15 D.Pulcher;1174688; said: So what exactly should I be putting in my sig? Not silvers but NTT Click to expand... For NTTs, it would be Datnioides undecimradiatus.
D.Pulcher;1174688; said: So what exactly should I be putting in my sig? Not silvers but NTT Click to expand... For NTTs, it would be Datnioides undecimradiatus.
vanimate Blue Tier VIP MFK Member Jun 3, 2005 3,382 27 356 Chicago ŅŞ Oct 4, 2007 #16 I wouldnt buy anything from that place w/o a pic. They just make up names of fish as they go.
