Thanks. Interesting stuff. I would say, though, that there are koi ponds as large or larger than 10,000 gallons in Japan and elsewhere being run very efficiently, with outstanding water quality, with what I believe to be less than 1,000 gallons of bio media. I could be wrong about that, but I don't believe so.
So, what is nature's secret to bio filtration without water changes? We can say it's primarily due to a far lower bioload, but have you seen some of the conditions in which healthy fish exist? Have you seen a shallow hippo pond, loaded with hippos, hippo dung and urine, with an underwater camera showing dozens of big, healthy fish swimming around? Surely that's not an environment with toxic levels of DOCs, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate or anything else. If it were, we'd see evidence of stress -- bacterial infections, fin and tail rot, etc. Yet the fish are in apparently perfect health.
Something is processing that bioload efficiently and thoroughly enough for healthy aquatic life to exist there, and without water changes.
I still see the holy grail of filtration as a system in which only evaporated water needs to be replaced (perhaps with trace elements added) in order for pristine water quality to be maintained -- a system with water replacement but not water change. To me, it's just a matter of time until such a system is a reality. I'm not saying it will happen tomorrow, but it will happen eventually with technological advancement.
I do also agree with those in this thread who've pointed out that the price of reducing water change frequency and volume may have too high a price in my current design. The juice may not justify the squeeze, so to speak.
So, what is nature's secret to bio filtration without water changes? We can say it's primarily due to a far lower bioload, but have you seen some of the conditions in which healthy fish exist? Have you seen a shallow hippo pond, loaded with hippos, hippo dung and urine, with an underwater camera showing dozens of big, healthy fish swimming around? Surely that's not an environment with toxic levels of DOCs, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate or anything else. If it were, we'd see evidence of stress -- bacterial infections, fin and tail rot, etc. Yet the fish are in apparently perfect health.
Something is processing that bioload efficiently and thoroughly enough for healthy aquatic life to exist there, and without water changes.
I still see the holy grail of filtration as a system in which only evaporated water needs to be replaced (perhaps with trace elements added) in order for pristine water quality to be maintained -- a system with water replacement but not water change. To me, it's just a matter of time until such a system is a reality. I'm not saying it will happen tomorrow, but it will happen eventually with technological advancement.
I do also agree with those in this thread who've pointed out that the price of reducing water change frequency and volume may have too high a price in my current design. The juice may not justify the squeeze, so to speak.