Fight of the century: mayweather vs pacquiao thread

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
besides, with an op like yours, stop complaining about the contents of the thread, geez

the fight is such a long ways, you want hits and bumps in here don't you? stop whining
 
I just think both our points could've been made in two posts. not 10+. Even I get tired of reading same crap. You had like two legit question. The rest was just regurgitating the same thing from post #1

I vote quality over quantity

Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
Lol that's cuz you take things too literal. Believing a fight will be swayed a certain direction by outside forces should've encompassed all possibilities of foul play instead of taking the literal interpretation based on a quick internet post.

never in my mind, despite agreeing with a few post, did I imagine mayweather donating a large sum of money to a judge. it'd always have to be someone working on his behalf or just someone with a vested interests in the outcome and if anyone had any proof of this right now, it'd be front page news everywhere. So you're literally chasing moby dick by asking for proof and being an ass just for implying because you can't supply proof, you shouldn't even bring it up. No harm, no foul. You don't have to be boxing's crusader fighting against people who think boxing is losing its luster (dead) or that corruption happens (conspiracy theory) in the sport.

Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
roflmfao!!

man, just shut the hell up, and take a deep breath and literally FYOF already

i'm not even asking for proof, geez.

i'm saying I have no reason to believe it. it's my belief. no one else's. it's ok that someone else believes it their way, alright??? I just don't agree with the logic behind that belief. but whatever.

stop telling me what I should or shouldn't do in a public forum. but what you need to do is stop getting it twisted

if someone said, "pac is paying an official to cheat"

then I have the reasonable right to take that literally, don't I?? to hell with your generalizing, i'm taking that particular statement at face value

I don't have to accept a general idea that there is conspiracy. if people are throwing out specifics, then I have the right to agree with some and disagree with others.

lol @ boxing crusader. if people voice one thing, I should be able to voice an opposite opinion. that's all I do
 
Let's make an over/under ... will the fight have more or less misses than Sumo/Ballin's circular posting? Anyone? I say less :)
 
can you elaborate dp?

what's an "over/under?" and what do you mean by more or less misses?



and we should ban eddie from this thread until like 2 weeks out of the event
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom