vamptrev Silver Tier VIP MFK Member Apr 23, 2007 8,226 865 924 Chesterfield MI Aug 7, 2007 #1 i saw this pic on a page about payara, and it had tat under it. any clue?
S sicxspeed Jack Dempsey MFK Member Dec 28, 2006 1,280 2 36 Ryht Bye De Beech Aug 7, 2007 #2 that is one of the worst pics i've seen. hahahaha, sorry, had to.
vamptrev Silver Tier VIP MFK Member Apr 23, 2007 8,226 865 924 Chesterfield MI Aug 7, 2007 #3 sorry i fixed it. is it relly a tat baby?
S sicxspeed Jack Dempsey MFK Member Dec 28, 2006 1,280 2 36 Ryht Bye De Beech Aug 7, 2007 #4 oh wow, looked again. Doesnt even look like the same fish. Very nice. I'm not familiar with it but im going to google it now. Thanks.
oh wow, looked again. Doesnt even look like the same fish. Very nice. I'm not familiar with it but im going to google it now. Thanks.
sirasoni Feeder Fish MFK Member Jul 13, 2006 739 1 0 Palos Verdes, CA Aug 7, 2007 #5 I've never even heard of a redtail being that small, but Dr. Schleser is a highly respected guy...
K KRSwop1 Candiru MFK Member Jun 5, 2005 583 2 48 44 Bay Area, CA Aug 7, 2007 #6 It's covered in fish lice. Really really bad. Doesn't even look like a redtail.
vamptrev Silver Tier VIP MFK Member Apr 23, 2007 8,226 865 924 Chesterfield MI Aug 7, 2007 #7 looks like the pattern of the fish to me. that many lice he would be dead
K KRSwop1 Candiru MFK Member Jun 5, 2005 583 2 48 44 Bay Area, CA Aug 8, 2007 #8 Nope it's lice. Check the fins. They're raised bumps.
R reddragon343 Feeder Fish MFK Member Dec 31, 2005 682 0 0 singapore Aug 8, 2007 #9 ....looks like a doctored photo.....that, or thats the strangest looking payara ever...
DB junkie Gold Tier VIP MFK Member Jan 27, 2007 9,065 1,935 2,053 Iowa Aug 8, 2007 #10 I've been told that Tats ARE spotted when really small.