WOW< I am glad I did not post my 55 Gallon tank with 48 African Chiclids in it. As brutal as these people are on you!!
WOW< I am glad I did not post my 55 Gallon tank with 48 African Chiclids in it. As brutal as these people are on you!!
I'm always surprised by all the "overstocked is unnatural" comments. Aquariums are inherently unnatural. If Earl's tank had two fish in it, it would still be grossly cramped to the wild environment where big predatory fish might encounter each other from many meters away, if at all. Fish are also "supposed" to be able to swim their entire lives without encountering an impenetrable glass barrier, let alone be imprisoned in a minuscule fraction of their native range.
My point is that it is rather pointless to rag on certain members for an artificially created notion of what constitutes "moral" fish care. Regardless of how lightly you stock, you're still stuffing fish into a tiny box for your own personal amusement...Earl's amusement just involves more fish than most.
Bottom line is that 375G is small for all of those fish- he admits that he wishes he had more room for a larger tank. OP states that he "has his own ways" and some sort of special "method." I believe this special "way" and "method" is most likely why he lost some of his fish while on vacation...but instead of speculating, I will ask...what happened while you were on vacation? Do you know why the fish died?
My biggest issue with bragging about keeping lots of large notorious killers in a small tank is that there seem to be a lot of young kids on this website (not saying that OP or any of the JDM advocates are young), but I think when they see tanks like this, they think that it's cool and something to aspire to. This type of fishkeeping is risky and will often result in lots of dead fish. Whether it's from an ammonia spike from keeping such a huge bioload in such a small tank, from a fish going on a killing spree, fish trying to jump out or from being away from your tank (i.e.- vacation) and not being able to monitor things it's not the best way to keep fish.
I FULLY realize the "best way" is a subjective/relative term, but no one here can refute that if one of these fish had the tank to themselves, the chances of keeping the fish successfully for their full lifespan would increase. For all of the younger kids that are just getting into the hobby, this tank is not a good example of where you should start and IMHO, nothing to aspire to...but like I said, this is just my opinion. I don't think I should be censored for posting a comment on a public forum, since people come onto this site to learn and I think they should see the different methods of fishkeeping. I have been told that I need to add more fish to my setups and that is fine...it's their opinion that more fish would improve my setup. You can tell me that I need more fish and I can tell you that you need a bigger tank. That's fine. Telling people to "shut up" is childish. Let's have some dialogue...and try to learn from one another....
I'll try to end on a positive note and maybe get into some constructive dialogue (as I realize I have been critical)...I would like to hear people's theory as to why cramming large fish into a small tank reduces aggression. Why do you think they don't annihilate one another in these overstocked conditions?