For better circulation, just at a power head...better than the spray bar anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
The vinyl hose you are using isn't re-enforced? The reason I am asking is the bend it makes over the tank would likely cause as much GPH loss as a 90 degree sweeping 3/4" elbows. I haven't tested GPH with the spray bar but I doubt it is much less than with that dual nozzle that comes with the filter. I was looking for better spread and stronger current but keep in mind I have mine running on a smaller tank. I know the current with the spray bar versus the nozzle is so much better it really shows what this filter is capable of doing. I think also what makes the spray bar more effective as far as current is the pressure it creates like putting your finger over a water hose tip. So I imagine that would sacrifice GPH a bit but probably only marginally. I would be interested to either run a GPH test on this myself or if someone else already has I would be interested in seeing the numbers. Cool stuff.I agree with the hosing issue, all you need is 1" Id hosing, and the stock ribbed hosing slows down gph as well. Here's a 15$ way of adding performance to your fx5, plus the clear hosing makes it just look cool too!
![]()
![]()
I like the spray bar idea but I feel like all the 90degree bends hinder the flow, less bends, less length equals more flow and with my fx5 on a 125 I need all the gph I can get
__________________________________________________________________
Go S.Vettel #1 RB8 3X WDC!!!!!!!!!
>http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?504763-Cheap-plants-less-nitrate!-POTHOS
Yeah....I use a braided reinforced vinyl tubing from my FX5 to my custom spray bar. Makes a HUGE difference in current and surface agitation. The main issue I have with the FX5 is the dual nozzle. It does nothing to help display the power this filter really has. I know when I first made the spray bar and hooked it up I was shocked at the difference in current in my tank. Shocked is an understatement.
The vinyl hose you are using isn't re-enforced? The reason I am asking is the bend it makes over the tank would likely cause as much GPH loss as a 90 degree sweeping 3/4" elbows. I haven't tested GPH with the spray bar but I doubt it is much less than with that dual nozzle that comes with the filter. I was looking for better spread and stronger current but keep in mind I have mine running on a smaller tank. I know the current with the spray bar versus the nozzle is so much better it really shows what this filter is capable of doing. I think also what makes the spray bar more effective as far as current is the pressure it creates like putting your finger over a water hose tip. So I imagine that would sacrifice GPH a bit but probably only marginally. I would be interested to either run a GPH test on this myself or if someone else already has I would be interested in seeing the numbers. Cool stuff.
So with the reinforced vinyl tubing you can make the 180* over the rim like the factory tubing?
>http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?504763-Cheap-plants-less-nitrate!-POTHOSWell, I just learned something useful on this site...there's a first! KAKAAAAW! ON IT.
No but I think it is more rigid so the bend isn't as restrictive.So with the reinforced vinyl tubing you can make the 180* over the rim like the factory tubing?
Regular 1" vinyl kinks if you do anything more then a 90, so my intake tube is mounted on the front glass pane to avoid a huge bend and kink, and the output hose is right on the water line so there is no bend < then 50ish degrees plus no dual outputs just a straight 1" pipe, the tubes look like a C from the canister to the tank, not necessarily the most pretty way but in terms of performance I have no significant bends and my flow is noticeably increased!
I'm out of town so I will show you pics on Monday, and I'm not sure if the reinforced pipe can bend 90 or not.
__________________________________________________________________
Go S.Vettel #1 RB8 3X WDC!!!!!!!!!
>http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?504763-Cheap-plants-less-nitrate!-POTHOS
You would think the engineers at Hagen would see these issues also and correct the problems?? After all is it not the job of the engineer to design new models and correct problems with current models I think thats what they are paid for. You folks with a good mind for improvements should be getting paid by Hagen for doing something they should be doing on there own? With few exceptions as you will have a occational bad unit the filter should do all this right out of the box not be reengineered to make it work at its full potential or at the very least make these available as aftermarket options. I have never been hidden,I'm not a fan of this filter but I use two until I get rich or have a windfall so to say![]()
Why? The filter sells just fine as it is. With the majority of owner being completely satisfied with it. Hagen would be stupid in a business sense to mess with it.