Hoyo12;4351515; said:So, just to make things clear, the picture does not need to be "high quality"? Just based off the look of the Gar? Not sure how to explain the "high quality" part... like your pics xander! lol
Sure, I can get good pics, but I'm working with a Canon PowerShot A590 IS, so they are definitely not the best.
Yeah, I'd make sure that. And a full body shot I'm guessing? Guess I might give it a try... time to get to work then. lolxander;4351522; said:Most important is that the gar is not out of focus and there aren't severe flash/water splashings obstructing the image
Hoyo12;4351536; said:Yeah, I'd make sure that. And a full body shot I'm guessing? Guess I might give it a try... time to get to work then. lol
jcardona1;4351462; said:what about POTM and TOTM. come on xander, work your red title magic
![]()
Madding;4351504; said:For what it's worth, the golden gar will not be starring in any photography sessions until its tail heals from the debacle with the (since moved) fly river turtle.
xander;4351583; said:just realised i had the wrong email add up for the last few minutes, so if you've sent in any pics do re-send them to xandermfk@gmail.com
Gr8KarmaSF;4351906; said:![]()
n00b....lol