liquid test is more accurate than stripsI do strip tests for hardness, nitrites, ammonia etc. Every time I do water changes. But they seem stunted for no apparent reason.
liquid test is more accurate than stripsI do strip tests for hardness, nitrites, ammonia etc. Every time I do water changes. But they seem stunted for no apparent reason.
They look like giant groumi (coloration and patterns) and they're behavior matchesYou sure these are giant gourami and not something else? I've seen massive ones in swamps with stagnant water.
As juveniles, "colours and patterns" don"t really exist on giant gourami, they are an extremely drab looking fish. Hardly any growth at all in over a year is basically impossible with GG, they're one of the fastest growing fish in the hobby.They look like giant groumi (coloration and patterns) and they're behavior matches
I think it was the India giant gourami (Trichogaster fasciata), which just grew over 4". I also found it weird that its common name was Indian giant gourami when it nowhere near the same size as Osphronemus goramy.I seem to recall that many years ago there was a member of the genus Trichogaster (I think...) that had several common names, and one of them was "giant gourami". They only got to about 4 or 5 inches, so the name never made sense to me. They looked like somewhat drab, larger Dwarf Gouramis. Back then the true Osphronemus was not seen much in the hobby, at least not up in Canuckistan. As esoxlucius stated, true Giants don't have much for colour or pattern at that small size.
Really need a pic.
That's the one. Not even as big as some others in the hobby, like the Snakeskin or the Blue, but labelled as "giant". I think they are referred to as "banded" today, don't even know if they are available anymore.I think it was the India giant gourami (Trichogaster fasciata), which just grew over 4". I also found it weird that its common name was Indian giant gourami when it nowhere near the same size as Osphronemus goramy.