got two new dats pls id

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
hehe, since every1 already corrected that comment, i don't need to mention it anymore, nice wide bars ^^
 
come on the owner knows what they are :D

hes playing with you
 
magandang isda ;)
 
I was told that they were both ST so I payed and ST price for both of them... just wanted to make sure. thanks for the comments guys. will return them tomorrow
 
Let's clear out some things. They are Datnioide Pulchers. Some hobbyists will call those from your pictures Siamese Tigers, but I personally do not consider them "true" Siamese Tigers, I would call them Cambodian Tigers, because of their tail pattern. "True" Siamese Tigers last body stripe does not bleed into the tail stripes. But both species (Cambodian and Siamese) are Datnioide Pulchers.
 
EKen53;1388085; said:
Let's clear out some things. They are Datnioide Pulchers. Some hobbyists will call those from your pictures Siamese Tigers, but I personally do not consider them "true" Siamese Tigers, I would call them Cambodian Tigers, because of their tail pattern. "True" Siamese Tigers last body stripe does not bleed into the tail stripes. But both species (Cambodian and Siamese) are Datnioide Pulchers.
Click to expand...

wise words i would also class them as CT but for some strange reason some body chage CT from Cambodian tiger to contraversial tiger

CT/ST = dat pulcher :D
 
mansterkill;1389468; said:
Ok now I am confused..... Is it a pulcher or not?
Click to expand...

In my books yes..it is a pulcher.

Eken53 is saying that it is not a 'true' pulcher because it does not display the typical pulcher tail stripe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom