Growth stunted shark on aquabid?.

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I hate seeing Nurse sharks sold to private owners.
 
Well - if it's actually 10 years old - then it's on the small size(growth stunted). Since the shark is about 4' long(total length), that would mean it's only grown about 3.5-4" per year. Which is at the bottom end of Nurse sharks in the Wild.

Yes, Nurses seem to grow slowly - but that's really because it takes them so long to reach maturity. In the wild - it may take them about 15-20 yrs to reach the mature size of about 7-7.5 ft (average abotu 4-5" per year). In captivity - Nurses tend to grow a bit faster(more regular feedings & constant water temps), usually about 6-9" per year.

But I also agree - the Nurse shark isn't really suited for private ownership. Although they are one of hardiest species of sharks to keep. The real problem is people often buy them as small 1-2" pups - and fail to realize that this species really need a working long term plan to keep it for it's entire life.
IMPO - they may actually be worse for the private aquarist to attempt to keep than Blacktip reefs. Here's why.

- Nurses have life span at least twice as long as a Blacktip reefs - Nurses are known to live over 35 yrs, while Blacktip Reefs barely reach 15 yrs.
-They get much larger & heavier - at 9-10' and nearly 300 lbs for the Nurse, vs. about 6' and 100lbs for the Blacktip reef.
- Require more food annually per adult shark - about 300-400lbs (Nurse) vs. about 200-250lbs (BTR)
- Require a tank with a larger minimum footprint & gallonage- Nurses are very active for a benthic shark - they need at least 1,000 Sq.ft & 35,000 gallons(Nurse) vs at least 650-700 sq. ft & at least 22,000-24,000 gallons (BTR).
 
Our ten to twelve year old nurse sharks are over 8 feet.... just for comparison sake.

Which sounds like a normal growth rate of Nurses raised in Captivity.

So that nurse - "if it's actually 10 yrs old" would be considered growth stunted.

Or is it all a lie - in an attempt to sell the shark - by making potential customers think it won't get much bigger. Remember he says that - it shouldn't get much larger. Which of course isn't true.
 
OK the image link wouldn't open for me right now:irked:, so since I can't see it, I'm limited, but could it be a short-tailed? If measurements are accurate, it's more likely that, than a Grey, Tawny, etc. I will try the picture-link again later. But note- I would doubt its age, and people who try to get rid of any shark are very quick to say "nope it's done growin, don't worry".. Usually complete BS.
 
OK the image link wouldn't open for me right now, so since I can't see it, I'm limited, but could it be a short-tailed? If measurements are accurate, it's more likely that, than a Grey, Tawny, etc. I will try the picture-link again later. But note- I would doubt its age, and people who try to get rid of any shark are very quick to say "nope it's done growin, don't worry".. Usually complete BS.

It's not a Grey, Tawny or short-tail. It's a nice fat Ginglymostoma cirratum. Seen enough of them to know it on site - even in photos.

http://www.aquabid.com/cgi-bin/auction/auction.cgi?sw&1195881009

http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/Gallery/Descript/nurseshark/nurseshark.htm

Speaking of - I've actually heard of people claiming that they have a Short-tailed nurse (as told by their LFS) when in fact - what they have is a juvenile common Nurse (Ginglymostoma cirratum). Which is a really scary thought.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com