(No Sticky - Please)
I am creating this thread as a reference point and collective resource of the taxonomic history of the Genus Potamotrygon.
If anyone has interesting information or can provide links to websites that provide information on the History of how the genus 'Poatmotrygon' came to this day, please add..
I am finding that alot of the mis-identification and confusion with the species is largely due in part to incomplete work done by the research done in South America in the 1800s, early 1900s.. Many identifications are based off pencil drawings, or hand-written notes taken in the field.. With freshwater rays being so polymorphic, the basis for identification is very inconsistent.
If we, as a community, can gather an extensive amount of information and resources related to how each species was defined in the past.. perhaps it will open up the door in the future for a proper reclassification of the entire genus.. or just a better understanding and clarification.
MFK - If you hadn't noticed, this sub-forum is one of the leading discussion areas in the world for FW Stingrays.. We should be honored to have the likes of Frank, Andreas, Mark, Mike, David, etc frequent this forum.. If we can continue to discuss thoroughly this type of information, perhaps we can acquire scientists working in the field to join the discussion, who will be able to take further steps towards a resolve.
I am creating this thread as a reference point and collective resource of the taxonomic history of the Genus Potamotrygon.
If anyone has interesting information or can provide links to websites that provide information on the History of how the genus 'Poatmotrygon' came to this day, please add..
I am finding that alot of the mis-identification and confusion with the species is largely due in part to incomplete work done by the research done in South America in the 1800s, early 1900s.. Many identifications are based off pencil drawings, or hand-written notes taken in the field.. With freshwater rays being so polymorphic, the basis for identification is very inconsistent.
If we, as a community, can gather an extensive amount of information and resources related to how each species was defined in the past.. perhaps it will open up the door in the future for a proper reclassification of the entire genus.. or just a better understanding and clarification.
MFK - If you hadn't noticed, this sub-forum is one of the leading discussion areas in the world for FW Stingrays.. We should be honored to have the likes of Frank, Andreas, Mark, Mike, David, etc frequent this forum.. If we can continue to discuss thoroughly this type of information, perhaps we can acquire scientists working in the field to join the discussion, who will be able to take further steps towards a resolve.




