How’s it going in America

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
The vibes im feeling seem to echo early 20th century eerily. American stability was what was good about the post WW2 era, and Americans benefited the most from this stability. To throw it all away seems reckless and plays into China’s hands as they now seem to be the stable mature one looking to the future not the past for the first time.
 
Ryan the early 20th century stability you mention was built on a set of moral and ethical values that governed US life and lifestyle, which have been lost, and by no accident. A slow, yet deliberately intentional erosion of values that once protected family, protected sovereignty and preserved the founding fathers original intentions for the US has resulted in the chaos, division and confusion we see today. People on both sides of the political spectrum are responsible.
 
A slow, yet deliberately intentional erosion of values that once protected family, protected sovereignty and preserved the founding fathers original intentions for the US has resulted in the chaos, division and confusion we see today
Hello; i do not know if this example fits into your comment. Yesterday in two different venues a somewhat similar thing played out on the national stage. One was a hearing in congress (senate I think), the other in the Supreme Court.
In the senate hearing a medical doctor, Dr Verma, was asked this question several times; Can a man have a baby? The doctors word salad i cannot faithfully repeat nor try to summarize. But she never simply said a man cannot have a baby. Later that evening a talking head sort of explained what happened. His take being had the senator said; Can a male have a baby? Then the doctor might have said - NO.
While I understand the distinction such is not acceptable from a medical professional. I personally do not want my doctor catering to the gender identity language and associated agendas. We all know we are genetically set at conception as XX or XY, Female or male. Females are called women or girls or lady or miss and so on. Males are called boys, men, Mr. gentlemen and such.

The example at the Supreme Court was somewhat similar as it is a case about biological males (men-boys) playing in women's sports. I will not try to summarize the exchange as it was so bizarre and i cannot recall the exact wording. I am sure the transcripts are available. Men (XY) do not belong in women's (XX) sports nor in girls' restrooms or locker rooms.
 
Hello; Some things ought to be mentioned with regard to the ACA. First being the original act depended on an unconstitutional part which was soon removed by the supreme court. That part included provisions which forced young and/or otherwise healthy to sign up for the health care plan. There were financial penalties to be applied to those who did not sign up. The court struck down that part.

That move by the court took away funding which was essential for the act to work at all. So, when in power advocates of the law started funding subsidies with taxpayer monies. I know of one man who is quite well off with a large fine home and acres of land outside of Louisville KY who managed to get on Medicaid some years ago because of these maneuvers.

Skip ahead to the pandemic years. Along with the massive printing of monies and shoving such out the door for the pandemic stuff the opportunity was used to sign up millions onto Medicaid. Millions who had not qualified before the pandemic and who currently continue to not qualify. The enhanced subsidies were scheduled to end by the very folks who wrote the law at the time. That was December of 2025. So, from a date during the pandemic unqualified people were given taxpayer monies to help pay for health coverage.

Here is an important take. Folks who did qualify back then and who today still qualify will not be losing the extra monies which help them get insurance. Only those who do not qualify have lost the subsidies as of 15 days ago.

Now we can discuss the reasons why some qualify and some do not if you wish to. The thing is those millions got a gift of taxpayer monies for a few years. It was supposed to be part of the pandemic largess and intended to be temporary. I know some people in my community who are truly disabled and do need such help as Medicaid. Those folks actually qualify. The millions you cite do not qualify so have lost he extra monies.

TL;DR

Long story short, according to the nonpartisan CBO, cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would result in roughly 13.7 million Americans losing their health insurance. Here's a state-by-state breakdown.


How many people in Australia are losing their health insurance?
 
How's it going?

US farm economy shows widening cracks as costs rise, jobs vanish: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...ing-cracks-costs-rise-jobs-vanish-2026-01-15/

"U.S. court records showed 293 farmers or farm operations filed for Chapter 12 bankruptcy in the first nine months of 2025, ⁠nearly 36% more than the total number of such filings in ⁠all of 2024....Meanwhile, tractor sales last year were down nearly 10% from a year earlier, while combine sales plunged more than 35%, according to the Association of Equipment Manufacturers..."

How about US manufacturing?

US factory headcount falling despite promised manufacturing boom


"Hiring in manufacturing, meanwhile, has been in the doldrums. The sector lost another 8,000 jobs in December, the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated, and factory employment has dropped more than 70,000 since April to 12.69 million as of last month - the lowest reading since March of 2022.... The much smaller mining and logging industry has also been losing jobs, down to 608,000 as of December versus 626,000 in April."
 
Hello; OK I'll bite. How does internal American politics infect the rest of the world?
Is that a serious question?

America's internal politics have trended in a direction that makes numerous people in various countries wake up each morning and wonder if WW3 started during the night. To be sure, there have been and will always be various other factors contributing to that possibility, but never in my lifetime was the U.S. on that list.

A poll asking this question would be interesting. In order for it to have any meaning or validity, it would need to be conducted internationally, rather than merely in the U.S., making certain to include responses from such places as Venezuela... Greenland... Panama... Iceland... Canada... and any other countries which have been affected either by direct action, or indirectly by rhetoric emanating from the U.S. leadership. At least, we're hoping it's just rhetoric...

...it really sounds like the US is steadily turning into the UK!
Not really, unless the U.K. has been quietly invading other countries on the sly...

I'm getting the feeling that one poster here, who apparently has a considerable amount of experience with banning, suspension, etc. is manipulating this conversation in a way intended to lure others into a political debate...all the while claiming that he is the one who has suffered mightily due to a double standard in the way that these things are handled here on MFK. Hell, every time I vow to myself I won't waste my time in Off-Topics, this fellow tosses another twitching lure into the morass and I jump on it like a bass on a crayfish. Got me again...
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com