PhullTank57 said:oh?... there's another ad there??![]()
i checked again.... nothing...
PhullTank57 said:oh?... there's another ad there??![]()
I was referring to TFH. In the January issue, the MFK ad is on page 76 and the WW ad is on page 78. I do recall one TFH issue where all three predatory fish board ads (MFK, WW, and AP) ended up on the same page or facing pages. The MFK ad was a larger ad though. At any rate, I was just joking about hating the ads. In fact, I really liked the one w/ the bumblebee grouper!neoprodigy said:i checked again.... nothing...![]()
PhullTank57 said:Don't be a hater, be a Congratulater!!... that's my motto!![]()
icthyophile said:I was referring to TFH. In the January issue, the MFK ad is on page 76 and the WW ad is on page 78. I do recall one TFH issue where all three predatory fish board ads (MFK, WW, and AP) ended up on the same page or facing pages. The MFK ad was a larger ad though. At any rate, I was just joking about hating the ads. In fact, I really liked the one w/ the bumblebee grouper!![]()
For some reason, the original quote always gets dropped on MFK when replying to a response. Only the last statement shows up as a quote. If you refer to my original post, you'll see that I joked about hating the MFK ads because they're always on the same page as the WW ads. The implication was that the larger MFK ads were drawing attention away from the WW ads, but no one appears to have made that inference. Thus, my statement was meant as a compliment, but it seems to have been too subtle.IoStrisciare said:point being?