Hybrid discussion from Mo's thread....

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
It's like you said, hybrids are already accepted. i.e-S discus x S. aequifasciatus

Other than that, I say NO don't accept hybrids.
 
Yes there are properly mixed dog breeds but you don't see them in dog show and are not AKC certified-personally, if someone wants to own a hybrid that is their choice but putting them in the ACA -another story.
 
Hybrid owners weren't the only ones biting their tongues (warning: this might get ugly, hope I don't get banned).

Hybrids are in direct contrast to the conservation of cichlid species. If one of the ACA's main goal is conservation, then no of course they should not allow hybrids. Even worse than trimacs are lyonsi, which are the big new trend and species adding to the flowerhorn mix. This is an incredibly rare fish in the hobby and in the wild, with a tiny natural range that is being destroyed. More than any other, this species is in a very real danger from the "f-word."

But what really amazes me is how people don't know or don't realize how wrong hybrids are. Not only is it unethical, it's immoral. Maybe becuase I'm an old school aquarist or just a grumpy old man, but it's the fact people don't understand that it's wrong is what gets people so pissed about this issue. There is no why, your internal moral compass should tell you that it's wrong just like beating a child or kicking a dog. Yes there are a few people that don't see those as wrong either, but they don't decide the laws of the land luckily. Nor should those with bad internal moral compasses determines what happens to this hobby and industry. People with them should, at the very least, have all their fish and other pets taken away and never allowed to have pets again since they obviously have shown they can't be responsible. They should be fined enough that none of their children should be able to go to college. Of course, these are the mildest punishments I would do, but the other ones are really shouldn't be posted, kids do read this stuff.

That is why this becomes such a hotly debated issue each time it comes up, becuase us old guards see it as a moral issue.
 
big train;2136202; said:
Why does it matter what the ACA's opinion of hybrids is ? It won't change what is happening on the hybrid scene at the lfs in your area. I don't know anyone in real life at the lfs around here that is a member or has attended a event by the ACA i have seen them only online. So if this group gives it's blessing on hybrids or not it just means nothing imo.

Oh I don't think it matters to the aquarium hobby what the ACA's stance is. Really it makes a big difference for the ACA though. Accepting them or at least having a positive stance on them opens you up to a wider audience.

Bderick67;2136140; said:
I see so many people here on MFK that want the ACA to openly accept the "hybrids" into the organization. Yet here on MFK we have yet to do this ourselves. Our exclusion of a hybrid sub forum in the cichlid forum, but claim it's OK becuase we do have a Hybrid forum. Right like there is any logical reason for grouping flowerhorns and tiger muskies together in one forum.

You guys that are for change, maybe work on changing it here first.

MFK also ran an all hybrid ad in TFH.. MFK hardly excludes hybrids or outcasts them. There's a difference between seperation of ca/sa and FH/Hybrids, and just outright being derogatory/outcasting FH's/hybrids.

Hybrids has their own section to cover the myriad of hybrids because it works better that way.. not because anyone is outcasting FH's or staff/admin doesn't want them near CA/SA cichlids.
 
cichlaguapote;2136691; said:
Oh I don't think it matters to the aquarium hobby what the ACA's stance is. Really it makes a big difference for the ACA though. Accepting them or at least having a positive stance on them opens you up to a wider audience.



MFK also ran an all hybrid ad in TFH.. MFK hardly excludes hybrids or outcasts them. There's a difference between seperation of ca/sa and FH/Hybrids, and just outright being derogatory/outcasting FH's/hybrids.Hybrids has their own section to cover the myriad of hybrids because it works better that way.. not because anyone is outcasting FH's or staff/admin doesn't want them near CA/SA cichlids.

Really, the membership follows the structure that has been set. You have never seen what happens when a new member unknowingly posts his cichlid hybrid in the cichlid forum? There's even valid threads regarding the safe keeping of a female cichlid from another species male cichlid and people flame and call for the removal of the thread.

Why start with ACA when we have more then enough work to do here?
 
I personally like it the way it is, no hybrids. How are hybrids going to be judged when there's really no set standards? No two are alike.


People that keeps hybrids also keep pure fishes so if they really want to join the ACA they would of already, no need to add hybrids just to get a few more memberships.
 
darth pike;2136510; said:
Hybrid owners weren't the only ones biting their tongues (warning: this might get ugly, hope I don't get banned).

Hybrids are in direct contrast to the conservation of cichlid species. If one of the ACA's main goal is conservation, then no of course they should not allow hybrids. Even worse than trimacs are lyonsi, which are the big new trend and species adding to the flowerhorn mix. This is an incredibly rare fish in the hobby and in the wild, with a tiny natural range that is being destroyed. More than any other, this species is in a very real danger from the "f-word."

But what really amazes me is how people don't know or don't realize how wrong hybrids are. Not only is it unethical, it's immoral. Maybe becuase I'm an old school aquarist or just a grumpy old man, but it's the fact people don't understand that it's wrong is what gets people so pissed about this issue. There is no why, your internal moral compass should tell you that it's wrong just like beating a child or kicking a dog. Yes there are a few people that don't see those as wrong either, but they don't decide the laws of the land luckily. Nor should those with bad internal moral compasses determines what happens to this hobby and industry. People with them should, at the very least, have all their fish and other pets taken away and never allowed to have pets again since they obviously have shown they can't be responsible. They should be fined enough that none of their children should be able to go to college. Of course, these are the mildest punishments I would do, but the other ones are really shouldn't be posted, kids do read this stuff.

That is why this becomes such a hotly debated issue each time it comes up, becuase us old guards see it as a moral issue.







How is this whole post "trying to keep the peace"????? I'm not sure it is...I think people with such narrow minds, should be reduced to not keeping pets or having children....Wow:screwy:
 
Yeah, that was a bit excessive, probably should have cooled down more after reading some of the posts in the thread before posting.

So let me try it this way: This will always be a hot and nasty subject becuase it is a moral issue to many older aquarists. Attacking moral stances is akin to attacking religious ones, there will always be heated responses. 20 years ago there was no debate, everyone knew it was wrong. A lot of places refused to sell fake parrots, and people that brought in say convict/sept crosses watched them get fed to pikes/oscars/catfish.

Things have deffinately changed, but us old guard ones won't I am sure. Telling us flowerhorns are okay is like telling us stealing is okay or our religion is wrong.

The thing of it is of course, not everyone has the same morals. What is right for one person isn't always right for the next.

But in regards to the ACA, as I said (and it was probably lost in my hyperbole in the first post) hybrids are at the complete opposite of consveration, so no the ACA should not allow them.
 
For some context, the IBC (Internation Betta Congress) focuses on "advancement, friendships, and conservation" of bettas (www.ibcbettas.org).

They seem to be able to balance the advancement of fancy strains of bettas with the conservation of wild-type species...by focusing on...responsible fishkeeping...

An excerpt from the home page of their website:
"Official IBC Code of Ethics:
IBC members welcome everyone who is interested in betta, whether new at owning and/or raising betta or an old pro who has raised thousands.

The IBC feels there is room for all betta enthusiasts, young or old, new or experienced, individuals, families, team or commercial breeder.

The IBC is a club of individuals, families, teams, and commercial breeders who support the keeping, breeding, and or the showing of betta bred by members, the research into the genetics of the betta and support of the preservation of the wild species through the Species Maintenance Program.

It is the policy of the IBC that members who sell trade or give betta to other must represent the description of the betta in a proper manner so as to assure that the buyers, consumers or recipients are not misled. An intentional misrepresentation would be a violation of the IBC policy and Code of Ethics."
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com