i.d. pls

[cichlaguapote]

IMO very hard to id from that pic.. It could be a number of things.

Also how big is it?

 

[moespeaking]

I retract my statement of parachromis even though I still feel it may be. The pic is just too blurry as you guys say.

 

[Iggyliciious]

here are some at least better pics. >.<
still srry for bad photos as im nt a photographer.
its abt 2"

 

[-Asianguy-]

i wanna say jag too. but i don't remember my jags having vertical stripes like that. and my jags always had less spots.

maybe its a hybred.

 

[M|L]

It's definitely not a jaguar/managuenses or anything close to it.

Looks more like an Amphilophus sp.

 

[---XR---]

definetly, not a parachromis

but there is a number of different speices it could be

 

[Marc280106]

That would be a Juvenile Amphilophus lyonsi.
Parachromis?

 

[fishman76092]

Probably not a lyonsi....not easily found here. It's definitely an Amphilophus (never could see Parachromis), probably an uncolored citrinellus/labiatus.

 

[ammerman19]

yup still have no idea other than I agree it's probably an amphilophus sp. pf some sort

 

[Iggyliciious]

wow... so many diff answers.... so hard to guess...