I give up on society

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
https://www.123test.com/is-iq-the-same-as-intelligence/


" Scores from intelligence tests are estimates of intelligence. Unlike, for example, distance and mass, a concrete measure of intelligencecannot be achieved given the abstract nature of the concept of "intelligence"
Yep, they sure don't measure academic acheivment. I stated previously that they were not perfect, but they do a good job of measuring intellegence. While the measurement may not be exact, it can be pretty close.
 
Just because I don't deny basic facts, like IQ tests, for example? You should back up your claims with evidence, like I have, Instead of attacking me ad hominem.

You have not proved anything junior. You keep on trying though.
 
:popcorn:
 
I happen to know a toxicologist (someone who deveops chemicals and tests them to see if they are safe.) personally. She is a friend of my grandmother, and is considered one of the best in her field, as well as an international expert on teratology (the study of how outside influences can effect developing animals) , particularly how chemicals effect people as they grow up, starting from before they are born. She's not any smarter than 90% of the people you know. She's not stupid by any stretch of the word, but she got where she is by working incredibly hard her whole life.

Yes, some people have an edge over others when learning certain things, how much of that is how you where brought up how much is genetic is anyone's guess (smart parents may just be more likely to raise their children to be smart.) Yes, there are stupid people as well, but for the most part it is about how interested, focused, and hardworking you are.
 
"Yep, they sure don't measure academic acheivment. I stated previously that they were not perfect, but they do a good job of measuring intellegence. While the measurement may not be exact, it can be pretty close."

Mhhh ok
 
Yep, they sure don't measure academic acheivment. I stated previously that they were not perfect, but they do a good job of measuring intellegence. While the measurement may not be exact, it can be pretty close.
If there is no exact measurement of intelligence, then it would be premature to claim we are getting close or still far from mesuring intelligence .
 
I provided links to two different articles published in peer reviewed journals. You have provided 0.
Success in a debate isn't measured in how many links you provide, otherwise all scientific papers would be nothing but links to other links
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com